Beer family court battle continues with appeal

Have a question or want to show off your project? Post it! No Registration Necessary.  Now with pictures!

  One party has filed an appeal in the ongoing family-battle over
   of Heidelberg Distributing Co., the region's largest beer

   A lawyer for Carol Miller, a co-owner of the company, and other
   of her family, filed notice Nov. 20 of appeal to the Ohio First
   District Court of Appeals, prolonging the nearly year-long legal
   over control of the 77-year-old company.

   In late October, Hamilton County Common Pleas Judge Steven Martin
   ruled that the company must hold a Dec. 31 shareholder meeting, and
   that both the co-owners must attend or be held in contempt of

   "This should not be a problem since both have agreed to attend such
   meeting if ordered by the court," the judge wrote in his
   ruling, adding that "the plaintiff shall be allowed to have equal
   representation on the board of directors."

   "I would not hesitate to enforce it by any means within the law,"
   continued Martin, who, at the time of the ruling said he would
   to monitor the case. The judge sent both sides a letter informing
   of his decision, in which he suggested they settle their
   The judgement was entered Nov. 20, and the appeal was filed the

   The judgment and ensuing appeal, stemmed from a lawsuit filed in
   December 2014, by Albert Vontz III, co-owner of the nation's 14th
   largest beer distribution company, against his sister Carol Miller,
   other co-owner. The suit also names other members of Miller's
   family, one of whom is the company's chief legal officer.

   Vontz's suit originally alleged a variety of problems at
   Heidelberg, ranging from the misappropriation of company assets to
   usurpation of corporate authority to inflated salaries for company

   He subsequently amended the suit to remove most of the original
   The suit ultimately focused on his request for an annual meeting,
   part so he could arrange for a transfer of his interest in the
   business. His suit claimed that the company has not held a
   meeting in more than a decade.

   Martin completed a two-day bench trial in September.

   The suit accused the Miller family of attempting to wrest
   from the Vontz family.

   One allegation in the suit was that the Miller family has packed
   Heidelberg board with five family members, compared to just one
   of the Vontz family. The suit also accused the Millers trying to
   out Vontz at a price "far below the fair value." The offer was made
   a Dec. 5, 2014 meeting as " `take it or leave it' " without

   In an answer filed in April to the suit, the Millers said Vontz
   had suffered no damages. They also point out that Albert Vontz Jr.
   named current CEO Vail Miller Jr. (Carol Miller's son) to the
   Heidelberg board in 1996.

   In his ruling, Martin stated that Vontz showed beyond a reasonable
   doubt that an injunction would be required to hold a much needed
   shareholder meeting.

   "The defendants have come up with a series of nightmare scenarios
   called them 'legitimate business purposes' to justify retaining
   perpetual control over the company."

   Albert Vontz Jr., father to both parties in the suit, presided over
   Heidelberg during its rapid growth starting in the 1950s. He died

   Named in the suit are Albert Vontz III's brother-in-law, Vail
   Sr., and two other Miller family members.

   Vontz and Carol Miller each own 50 percent of the voting shares of
   Queensgate-based Heidelberg.

   Vontz sought a permanent injunction that would prevent the Miller
   family from seizing control of Heidelberg's board.

   Heidelberg also operates facilities in Dayton, Evendale, Columbus,
   Cleveland and Hebron. It employs more than 1,400 workers. The
   organization generates more than $660 million in sales and serves
   than 20,000 retail accounts throughout Ohio and Kentucky.

   Read or Share this story:

Site Timeline