I only have these simple things to say: 1) My continued discussion of
>this thread threatens my job; I speak only for myself and nobody else, 2)
>The vets and scientists you mention, I respect them and their efforts, but
>repsectively disagree. They heard what I heard at the 'secret' conference
>where things discussed in 'confidence' were exposed, and we can disagree on
>this issue. However, organizations that have mission statements advocating
>euthanasia in cases where permanent captivity would be the only option is
>morally wrong, in my opinion, and I will go up against any Ph.D, DVM, or
>Fed on the subject. The stranding network is a public program and would
>not exist without voluntary participation by the public and private
>institutions, yet these things I speak of were brought to light in the
>first national meeting in ten years. With policies like that its no wonder
>NMFS does not have more frequent conferences, rather they keep information
>close to the vest and on a need to know basis. 3) Steno's are
>successfully maintained in captivity, so are pilot whales and false killer
>whales (the species most likely to mass strand), political agendas have no
>place in deciding who should live or die. I have said from the start, for
>me this is a life versus death issue. I am putting my career, my
>reputation, and future on the line by my ethical position that NO healthy
>baby whale or dolphin nor any healthy adult dolphin or small whale should
>be euthenized on the stranding scene before all reasonable efforts to place
>the animal have occurred. In my opinion, having experienced the network
>over ten years, this does not happen, unless excruciating hoops are jumped
>through. Facilities exist now, but communication does not. If we were
>talking about a massive pile up of cars with critically injured victims, by
>the philosophy we are using for dolphins, well you get the idea.
> Believe me, don't believe me, I don't care. I am on a crusade. Killing
> is wrong. Some will tell you dolphins are only animals. I happen to
> believe they are worthy of more consideration. After all, is that not why
> there is a Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972. What is really cheap are
> the cry babies who whine when they should look at their own souls.
> Government agents, scientists, and vets running scared of the truth. I
> have no apologies to them or you.
> I want more cooperation between the stranding network and the captivity
> industry, so what. It is my opinion to have and (not the views or
> opinion of my employer) as you suggested, and as I have stated, I am
> towing the line with my career to expose what I know in my heart is wrong.
> I find it hard to believe that with such an emotionally charged aimal,
> such as dolphins, that excuses like not enough people, time, or recourses
> applies in most cases, maybe in some, but certainly not in the majority of
> cases, whichs seems to me, to be the norm.
>
>> Jeff,
>>
>> There is no pleasant way to respond to you in this matter,
>> so I will not even attempt it.
>>
>> >>
>>>O.k., it seems that Mike, dolphin, and I, are the only
>>>people actually having good (serious) discussions,
>>
>
>> agreement as to the Truth might be obtained.
>>
>> With you, there is only a one direction of communication:
>> you post propaganda smeer attacks upon anyone and everyone
>> who inconveniently gets in the way of yourself and your
>> company's business operations; and, you expect everyone to
>> listen to you and believe you as if your pronouncements came
>> from Almighty God himself.
>>
>> Any and all demonstrations of the lack of validity of any of
>> your so-called facts, reasoning and/or conclusions,
>> regardless of the amount of documentation provided, are
>> either ignored or meet with ad hominem attacks.
>>
>>>so I want to bring up a thread I dropped.
>>
>> No, you wish to continue your propaganda attack on the NMFS
>> and other stranding organizations that don't go along with
>> your company's obvious desire to acquire new dolphins that
>> you can rent out.
>>
>>>I ran across this article on my desk (while cleaning
>>>desk).
>>
>> You have been asked for the exact source of this article and
>> so far failed to provide it. However, that's ok, as I
>> have provided the full text of the original Associated Press
>> article in Attachment A. Seems that you omitted over half
>> the facts.
>>
>>>Lets discuss how you feel about this (as I have stated,
>>>some of these animals should have been rescued had other
>>>oceanariums and aquariums been notified):
>>
>> > activists happy).
>>
>> How was it that you reached this absurd conclusion without
>> any investigation beyond reading the news article you quoted
>> from ( won't say "cited", because you did not state the
>> exact source of it). You clearly state that you did no
>> further investigation in Attachment C.
>>
>> Well, allow me to inform you from the investigation I did -
>> the one *you* should have conducted before making such vile
>> accusations against good people - just how far from the
>> truth your assinine article is:
>>
>> Dr. Gregory Bossart, one of the top marine mammal vets in
>> the world, with 20 years experience - and who was actually
>> present at the above incident as he himself had to conduct
>> the euthanizations - reported that many of those animals on
>> the beach were "in the process of dying already" (see
>> Attachment D).
>>
>> Some of those dolphins died on their own, before any
>> decision to humanely euthanize was even made (see Attachment
>> E).
>>
>> No other facility in the region was going to take those
>> animals, due to very real danger that these sick animals
>> were infected with a morbillus virus or other fatal disease.
>> That is why those these Stenos were kept at Mote Marine Lab
>> during a hurricane with personnel in attendance, when all
>> the other animals were evacuated (Attachments F and can be
>> confirmed by contacting Mote Marine Lab Dolphin and Whale
>> Hospital).
>>
>> Let us supposed they called your facility, Jeff. You are
>> 625 miles away. It would have maybe 12 hours to get your
>> people on site and all that time, those animals would have
>> been on the beach suffering and dying. And where would you
>> have put 15 or 20 sick dolphins which possibly had deadly
>> infectuous disease, and how would you transport them back to
>> Gulfport. How many more would have died on the way?
>>
>> Those infants were deemed amongst the least likely to
>> survive by one of the top marine mammal vets in the world,
>> who was right there to examine them, whilst you were 625
>> miles away. Of the 7 deemed strongest and best likely to
>> live, 4 of them died, too.
>>
>> Are you truly so arrogant as to believe your judgement in
>> this matter is superior to Dr. Bossart's ?
>>
>> *Here* is where credentials come into play, because you
>> present yourself as an "expert" and you seem to think you
>> are more expert than the good doctor, despite his having
>> vastly superior experience and credentials than yourself.
>>
>> Well, I don't buy it and I doubt anyone else reading this
>> will either.
>>
>> So this is an example of your skills an "investigative
>> reporter", bent upon exposing the crimes of the NMFS and
>> some stranding agencies?
>>
>> Well, possibly the Weekly World News would take you or
>> maybe even the National Enquirer, but nobody in their right
>> mind who sees *this* article is going to take anything you say
>> at face value after this, Jeff.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Michael A. Hobson
>> email: mike (at) crusader (dash) services (dot) com
>> icq: #2186709
>> yahoo: warrior_mike2001
>>
>> ===========================================================>> Note: all the copyrighted material below is reproduced for
>> the purpose of public education, criticism and/or commentary
>> and does not constitute infringement under the Fair Use
>> provision of the U.S. Copyright Act (17 USC 107)
>> ===========================================================>> Attachment A - (from Associated Press via USA Today)
>> Posted 8/8/2004 1:15 AM
>>
>>
formatting link
>> euthanized_x.htm
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> Dolphins stranded on Florida Atlantic coast euthanized
>>
>> HUTCHINSON ISLAND, Fla. (AP) - Thirty dolphins stranded on a
>> southeastern Florida beach were euthanized early Saturday
>> after experts and volunteers spent hours trying to get them
>> to swim back to the ocean.
>>
>> The roughtooth dolphins were part of a group of 36 dolphins
>> that beached themselves Friday on Hutchinson Island.
>>
>> With limited space at the area's lone care facility, experts
>> decided they could try to nurse only six dolphins back to
>> health.
>>
>> The remaining 30, including four calves, were given a lethal
>> injection that slows breathing and eventually stops the
>> heart, said Steve McCulloch, executive director of the
>> Division of Marine Mammal Research and Conservation at
>> Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institution in Fort Pierce.
>>
>> "It was a very painful, very emotional and very difficult
>> decision to make," McCulloch said. "You feel helpless in
>> this situation, but you can't let them suffer and there's
>> not enough facilities to care for them."
>>
>> The surviving six dolphins, two males and four females, were
>> taken to Harbor Branch's critical care pool and were being
>> monitored around the clock.
>>
>> Experts were planning to transport the six to Mote Marine
>> Laboratory in Sarasota on Sunday.
>>
>> Ten of the dead dolphins were taken to a necropsy lab at Sea
>> World. The other 20 were taken to a pathobiology lab at the
>> Florida Marine Research Institute in St. Petersburg, where
>> experts hope to determine why the dolphins stranded
>> themselves.
>>
>> Veterinarians chose the surviving dolphins based mostly on
>> condition, behavior and age; calves don't make good
>> candidates because they lack the social or survival skills
>> to eventually be released back into the wild, McCulloch
>> said.
>>
>> The six dolphins were moderately emaciated and dehydrated
>> and were still in the "critical care stage," McCulloch said.
>>
>> "But they're responding well to our treatment," he added.
>>
>> Another dolphin was sighted trying to beach itself near the
>> Fort Pierce inlet. If the dolphin does become stranded, it
>> will be added to the critical care pool.
>>
>> "It's very unlikely that he could survive on his own for any
>> length of time," McCulloch said.
>>
>> Copyright 2005 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.
>>
>> ===========================================================>> Attachment B - Your updated article on Dolfin.TV
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> Would you kill this dolphin just because it was
>> a stranded baby? By: DolfinTV_Editor
>>
>> Posted: Wed, July 20,2005
>>
>> U.S. Government policy allows euthanasia of baby whales and
>> dolphins. Many marine mammal rehabilitators would rather
>> kill a healthy baby whale or dolphin, if that animal is
>> deemed un-releasable by the National Marine Fisheries
>> Service (NMFS), than send it to a rehabilitation facility,
>> oceanarium, or aquarium. Many facilities are searching for
>> just such animals so they do not have to resort to wild
>> capture. The NMFS representatives seem to agree with the
>> policy of killing healthy whales and dolphins rather than
>> seeing them go to an aquarium. These are healthy animals,
>> that due to age at stranding or other circumstances, NMFS
>> agents prefer euthanasia than actually sending these animals
>> into rehabilitation, no matter prognosis.
>>
>> Hutchinson Island, Fla. 8 August 2004 - Thirty dolphins
>> stranded on a Florida beach were euthanized Saturday after
>> experts and volunteers spent hours trying to get them to
>> swim back to the ocean. The roughtooth dolphins were among a
>> group of 36 dolphins that beached themselves Friday on
>> Hutchinson Island, north of Palm Beach. With limited space
>> at the area's lone dolphin-care facility, experts decided
>> they cuold nurse only six of the animals back to health. The
>> remaining 30 dolphins, including four calves, were given
>> lethal injections. "It was a very painful, very emotional
>> and very difficult decision to make," said Steve McCulloch,
>> executive dirctor of marine mammal research and conservation
>> at Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institution in Fort Pierce.
>>
>> [ written by Jeffrey Siegel, Stranding Coordinator,
>> Institute for Marine Mammal Science
>> Gulfport, Mississipi, USA
>> Phone: (228) 575-8444
>> Fax: (228) 575-8899 ]
>>
>> ===========================================================>> Attachment C - Your (Jeff Siegel's) post dated 16/Jul/2005
>> to A.A.D. newsgroup.
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> From: "Happy Feelmore"
>> Newsgroups: alt.animals.dolphins
>> Subject: Re: Back to controversey
>> Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 04:53:27 -0500
>> Message-ID:
>>
>> Whereas I do not know the specifics in this case, it is
>> known that in this species, when the leader is sick,
>> confused, and exhausted he/she seeks shallow water. The
>> other animals simply follow the leader, sick or not. I don't
>> know the exact disposition of the other six, however, I
>> think a couple are still in facilities, a couple were
>> rehabbed and released, and a couple died (best guess).
>> The article was in the news paper of the city cited,
>> perhaps they know more.
>>
>>> Mr Siegel,
>>> Is there any news on what caused those 36 rough
>>>toothed dolphins to beach themselves?
>>>
>>> I'd also be interested in how those 6 rescued dolphins are
>>> going.
>>>
>>> The Dolphin Mermaid
>>>
>>
>> ===========================================================