Brown: 24-hour drinking law to be reviewed

No, I am not aware of any newspaper that can be relied upon to give reliable facts. They get things wrong, embellish and even lie. The Daily Mail is one of the worst, it has no respect for fact at all.

Svenne

Reply to
Svenne
Loading thread data ...

It is another feeble measure to show it is Brown in charge not Blair (because otherwise nobody would notice). Same with the casino 're- think'.

Watch 'In the Thick of it' and you'll get the picture....

Reply to
whitely525

There was one study, published last week

But how they can say that the results from a single A&E department can safely be extrapolated to cover the whole country, I don't know.

And what that story also does not mention is the overall effect. It says only that the number of alcohol related "night visits" had risen from 79 to 250 for the same month a year apart. They really should have counted the overall total, not just "night visits".

"Night visits" being defined as between 9PM and 9AM, and "alcohol related" being defined as "if they had drunk before going to hospital, or if they were intoxicated when examined or in their final diagnosis. "

So not actually anything to do wit whether the injury was caused or exacerbated by alcohol either.

Reply to
Alex Heney

That's quite right: my local paper (Coventry Evening Telegraph) had a very small piece in it last week saying that my local hospital had experienced no such rise in admissions. Obviously such good news would not be worth the Daily Mail or even the Times wasting its newsprint on printing it!

Reply to
Christine

It doesn't actually mention that the little tick sheets they have in A&E never used to mention alcohol except where serious physical harm had occurred due to massive consumption, now they do.

What's the betting that during the changeover period any hospital would record minimal alcohol "related" episodes before and hundreds afterward.

Simple statement of fact most people drink at the weekend and in the evening if at all. Another fact most people go out for pleasure at the weekends and evenings.

Most injuries involve pleasure pursuits.

Take them together and you have the inescapable conclusion (in the Mail etc) that the injuries must be due to alcohol.

It strikes me that when more people visit pubs etc because as non-smokers they can enjoy the place now and they have accidents people will conclude that smoking prevents injuries.

Why doesn't the Mail stick to blaming Gordon Brown for the floods?

Reply to
Steven Pampling

This is similar to what happened when some health authorities increased their investment in mental health services and increased the number of hospital places available for sick people. This increase in the numbers of patients was taken as proof of the escalating impact of super strength cannabis on mental health.

Reply to
Phil Stovell

ffs - why do you keep quoting the Daily Mail and their distortions:

The Daily Mail: The British Crime Survey found that in the first full year of the new law the number of drink-related offences rose by

64,000 to 1,087,000.

The British Crime Survey: Based on the 2006/07 BCS there were

1,087,000 violent incidents where the victim believed the offender or offenders to be under the influence of alcohol. This is approximately the same as in 2005/06, when the estimated number of alcohol-related violent incidents was 1,023,000 (the apparent difference is not statistically significant)

(I think you recently said that you had always voted Tory - just about sums things up - you read it in the Daily Mail - it must be true (if you're a Tory))

Reply to
judith

I suspect he will dismiss it as it is "sensational" s**te - with nothing to back it up - see my earlier response with the source of their data.

Reply to
judith

I know of no other "newspaper" (using the term reservedly) who will lie and distort "facts" to the degree that the Mail will. (Oh.... ok, perhaps the Sun as well)

Why don't you start your move upmarket and graduate to the Sun as a first step?

Reply to
judith

The Mail is somewhat unique insofar as its editor has been allowed to present his own personal agenda as if it were the newspaper's policy.

Paul Dacre is tee-total and a fervent anti-gambler; he also appears to have an unhealthy obsession with both Charlotte Church and Cherie Blair.

You only have to pick up a copy of the Mail and these four things leap out at you on a daily basis.

Reply to
chuckles_the_scary_clown

Just how old are you?

Dave

Reply to
Dave

formatting link
70

Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't uno-hoo a retired policeman?

Cross postings removed.

Reply to
BrianW

Yes, real name Kev.

Reply to
Phil Stovell

So he has an axe to grind.

Reply to
BrianW

Well, let's see:

"The Home Office is carrying out a review, and the Department of Culture, Media and Sport is monitoring statistics, but recent reports show in some areas drink-related offences have soared by 130 per cent between 3am and 6am. "

What has happened to "drink related offences" at other times? 130% sounds bad, but if pubs are opening later it seems likely that any problems are being spread out more.

"The British Crime Survey found that in the first full year of the new law the number of drink-related offences rose by 64,000 to 1,087,000."

What is a drink-related offence? Are we really talking about alcohol-fuelled violence, or technical offences like drinking in a public place (which is often completely harmless)? How does the British Crime Survey measure crime? Actual convictions? Crimes reported by the public? Public perception of crime? Or is it because police can now give fixed penalties when in the past they couldn't, so now activities are reported as crimes when in the past the police just sensibly calmed things down and moved people on.

This article

formatting link
70 which is linked, gives no evidence that drunken violence has increased over the last 10 years, it just claims that some of the nouveau law-enforcement policies aren't working, which I'd probably agree with. As it's in the Daily Mail and offers no evidence of a 10-year increase in drunken disorderliness, the cynic in me would assume that that evidence doesn't exist.

Reply to
Phil Clark

No, I don't think there is one.

You should be quoting original data to support your stance. Then we could all analyse the British Crime Survey and say if we come to the same conclusions as you. As an ex-Policeman I would have thought analysing crime statistics would be something you could very easily do, without having to let the Daily Mail do your thinking for you.

Reply to
Phil Clark

I get fed up of all this talk of 24hr drinking , in reality very few or any pubs have a round the clock licence, the latest is probably

03.00 at weekends and midnight otherwise.
Reply to
Martyn Dawe

Fed up *with*.....

Reply to
Grammar pedant

DrinksForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.