SNCA Vertical

After all the talk about whether it's worth the willpower to cellar SNCA, I figured last night was as good a time as any to see how my little collection was faring.

Answer: Not Good.

Methodology: All beers have been kept refrigerated since purchase, either in a proper fridge or, a couple of times, in an ice chest when moving to a new house. It's safe to say that none of them have ever experienced temps about 50F since I've had them, and none have ever seen the light of the sun or a fluorescent bulb.

I used clean glassware. SNCA glasses, just to be extra-geeky about the whole thing.

Results:

2002: SHITE. Oh, sweet Jesus was this bad. Looked fine when poured, but a sniff told me this was going to be nasty. No hops, no malt. Just alcohol. A taste proved my nose right. Sort of like Bigfoot, only without the redeeming taste qualities.

2003: SHITE. See 2002.

2004: GOOD, but barely. There was still a fair amount of malt to be found in this bottle, and the hops hadn't yet faded entirely, but this was clearly going south in a hurry.

That was enough for one night. I'll be hitting the 2005 in the next day or two. I figure it's going to be just fine. And I'll be over my little obsession with collecting and cellaring SNCA. Drink it fresh, mates.

dave in austin

Reply to
dave kelley
Loading thread data ...

I finished the last of my SNCA 2005 in June and it was closer to a malt bomb than a hop bomb. ;^) That's not a complaint mind you as it was quite tasty that way.

Reply to
Bill Becker

I'm not surprised. SNCA has never struck me as being the sort of beer that would be that conducive to cellaring. For one, too much of its character depends on the more aromatic properties of its hops. Sure, it's got plenty of bitterness, but it's that fresh hop nose that really makes it (for example, it's the lack of that that makes me disappointed in this year's batch). And aroma is one of the first things to go as you start aging a beer.

More pertinently, it's just not that strong a beer to make for worthwhile cellaring. There are "everyday" American IPAs that are in the same neighborhood or exceed SNCA. Would you consider cellaring a bunch of Racer 5 (7 percent abv, compared to SNCA's 6.8), or Stone IPA (6.9)? I personally wouldn't. They lack both the alcohol and the complexity (and, IME, it's malt complexity that really makes for cellarable beers) for good multiyear evolution, and SNCA's in the same book, to me.

Still, I'm glad you did and reported on the experiment. I could have made this guess all I wanted, and had no way of knowing if it would be true or not. It's good to see some experience with it out there. Thanks for the report.

-Steve

Reply to
Steve Jackson

Ditto. Thanks.

Some years ago I would hold back a couple bottles of it to try alongside the fresh batch. That one-year difference alone was enough to convince me not to keep doing that, let alone save it longer.

Reply to
Joel

I agree, and I actually feel the same way about Bigfoot. I've done many Bigfoot verticals, and while it's drinkable for many years, it's a shadow of itself after only one year. The only thing that makes Bigfoot stand out in the crowd is its fresh hop character. Take that away with age, and it's pretty darned uninteresting.

Reply to
Jon Binkley

On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 22:28:32 +0000, dave kelley wrote (in message ):

Sierra Nevada IPA is an interesting one.

I was given a 6 pack of this all-English ingredient stuff last march and consumed the first four month by month over four months.

I would have drunk them sooner but I found it desperately boring - something like the terrible English "IPAs" like Greene King, only stronger (I am English btw). I just couldn't see the point.

After 7 months though, the fifth and sixth had matured beatifully. The hops and malt had gelled into something special. Not the piny/citrus hop monsters with high bitterness of most US craft breweries but a more subtle, highly refined and sophisticated beer.

I had my doubts at first about what KG was trying to achieve - it took

7 months to discover I was drinking it too fresh.

You could say 7 months approximates to the journey time to India - I should have known.

Reply to
Tim

That *is* interesting. Short-term cellaring. I've a bottle of Hercules double IPA that I'm now going to let sit for a few months. I wan't impressed with it at first, but maybe a little "time out" will be just what it needs.

dave in austin

Reply to
dave kelley

DrinksForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.