Closures for wine bottles

Hi,

This is the article I promised Dick I'd write. In passing, I'll try to address some of the inconsistencies of experience between those who taste regularly ad professionally, claiming corked wines amount to 5 to 15% of the total, and those of us who have our collections of old bottles and find nothing like that proportion.

  1. Many of us are pretty insensitive to TCA pollution or rather fail to recognise it as such, and therefore don't recognise a wine IS corked when it is.

Having said that many of us don't recognise TCA, I think we have all experienced bottles where the wine simply doesn't "show" as well as we expected it to. I guess (pure speculation on my part, but I would submit from my own experience that it is probably valid) that in many cases, this is due to TCA in quantities below _our_ capacity to recognise it. Someone more sensitive might well. This has certainly happened once, in a tasting with Mark and Andrew in New Zealand. I also DID detect it on a heavily corked bottle that had Mark rearing away in disgust. Subsequently I detected it during a blind tasting (of corks vs other closures) in Bordeaux. This personal experience makes me suspect that I am not as totally insensitive as I'd thought I was. The corrolary of that, of course, is that I must have VERY rarely been exposed to TCA previously in [detectable-by-me] quantities.

  1. TCA pollution has grown in proportion in recent years. 30 to 40 years ago, it certainly existed, but was very rare.

This will explain to some extent why those of us who mainly drink fully mature long aged wines will have experienced many fewer cases of corked wines than professionals such as Michael Pronay, and others here. These wines haven't yet passed into our "drinking now" category.

Furthermore, I've seen winery owners claim that by being ultra fussy about where they buy their corks from, they have very few - if any - cases of corked wines. I take these claims with a pretty large pinch of salt, but I think it would be a mistake to reject such evidence out of hand. Why?

Corks are sold under a plethora of quality ranges. The prices vary widely and the supply of the very best is strictly limited. I have no reason to believe that corks made from fully mature trees and using great care in selection, do not have a lower degree of contamination, though this would be random and variable. I think this is almost the only explanation as to WHY experiences very, and WHY the levels of contamination have grown. Demand for cork has spiralled beyond the wildest expectation of the manufacturers, and there was no WAY it could have been predicted 40 or 50 years ago, when cork oaks would have had to have been planted to give adequate supplies of top quality corks now. So more - perhaps most - cork is produced nowadays from immature trees, and from less propitious areas.

If we look at the production of cork, one thing stands out above all others. Cork, being produced by trees, will vary, depending upon many factors. I have seen many suggestions as to how and why cork becomes polluted with TCA. The most convincing suggestion I've seen so far, is that it is a combination of the presence of chlorine (used to bleach and sterilise the cork) and bacterial infection. I have also seen it said that cork taken from younger trees is more prone to TCA pollution, though I don't know how speculative this assertion was.

I don't know whether any of this chlorine is present naturally - common salt consists of 45/68ths chlorine as a chloride, though normally this is pretty stable and I'd not expect free chlorine to be present from sea salt, I daresay that some hypothetical bacterial driven redox reaction might be able to give measurable quantities, but I doubt it is could be a serious contender for the supply.

Remembering that the major suppliers of cork are in Portugal and, I think, Slovenia (?) neither of which are renowned as highly developed and industrialised countries, I can well imagine that research into alternative methods of sterilising cork has been at best spotty.

Assuming that all cork manufacturers are still processing - faute de mieux - cork with chlorine, then although this is probably the prime cause, it doesn't seem to be felt by the manufacturers to practicable at the moment, despite the intense threat to the industry by Stelvin, to eliminate it.

So we are left with the other factors which seem a bit vague. "Bacterial infection", "younger trees". Time will solve the second hypothetical cause, though it seems to me to be doubtful that the wine industry is prepared to wait for the "younger trees" to become old enough, or for the cork industry to eliminate chlorine.

Where do we go from here?

Although the quantities are minute, compared with traditional (bottles) containers, flexible multiple ply plastic bags with taps work very well indeed for wines to be drunk within say 3 to 4 months of filling. Given the proportion of wines (bought in bottles) drunk within a week of purchase, I would suggest that this method will see a huge expansion. It deserves to. I have not detected taint of any kind in this type of container.

Another possibility would be to use cans. I have seen wine marketed in this way, but so far, it has been very much lower end wine.

Turning back to bottles, the alternatives to cork are three fold, I think. a) Crown caps (as used for aging champagne), b) synthetic cork shaped closures, which theoretically can be opened with corkscrews, c)Stelvin or other screwcap.

On the surface, and from the point of view of the wine maker, b) seems to have all the advantages, as they can use their existing bottling lines, and just change their supplier of "corks". However, all the information I've seen has agreed that these plastic closures lead to other off flavours in the wine. So for a serious wine maker, it is no solution to substitute one contaminating closure for another.

That leaves crown caps and Stelvin. Both are costly solutions. In both cases, the winemaker would have to change his bottling line to adopt them and this is a serious investment to envisage. That said, it is perfectly possible that, just as there are mobile cork based bottling lines which travel around the wineries, so there will be mobile bottling plants using crown caps or screw caps. It is also true that small producers can even hand seal using crown caps, I've done it myself for beer.

What is certain is that as more and more ordinary wine is bottled either exclusively under synthetic closures, or as an optional extra, so consumer acceptance will grow. It's FAR easier to unscrew Stelvin or even to rip off a crown cap, than to pull a cork - they stick, they crumble, they break up, they break in half, there's a whole litany of problems that accompany pulling a cork. In at least one supermarket in the UK, they won't buy ANY wine not under synthetic closures. Consumer law in the UK rightly gives the consumer the right to expect to buy a product of "merchantable quality", and gives her/him the right to seek remedy at the point of sale. A corked bottle ISN'T of merchantable quality, and even if only 10% of clients come back seeking recompense, this still represents far too great a proportion of returns to be acceptable, not when the solution exists.

I think that in many countries, we're approaching a cusp where it will be as unthinkable for the consumers in that country that a winery should NOT offer wines under screw cap, as it is at present for corks. I hope so, because While not ALL TCA pollution is cork borne, best estimates suggest that 90% of it is. Elimination of THAT part would enable winery managers and consumers to put their finger on exactly how serious winery and barrel borne infection really is.

When consumer acceptance is virtually universal (except in France, of course) for "ordinary" wines, then two possibilities arise. It could well be that the reduction of pressure for cork closures world wide will finally allow the manufacturers to reduce the proportion of TCA contaminated corks to a sufficiently low level for them to be acceptable again. They could then find a "niche" market at the top end, for people who still want to age wines for >40 years and believe that cork is the "way to go". I find a parallel in HiFi, where valve based amps and direct cut vinyl have kept a market, while the great mass of the offer has moved on. Given that corks can be inserted using small scale machinery, this would be perfectly possible. I worked at this in a holiday job some 40 years ago, so I know that it is perfectly possible for one man to bottle a barrel in about an hour, allowing abt 20 seconds a bottle.

Another possibility is that winemakers, who have installed Stelvin or other alternative screw cap or crown cap bottling lines, for the lower end wines, designed to be drunk young, simply abandon corks, even at the top end. I'll not weep tears for the cork manufacturers, who didn't take the problem of TCA seriously enough for >20 years. What THEY'll have to do is to find alternative uses for the raw material. It is still excellent for many things where there is no food contact.

Reply to
Ian Hoare
Loading thread data ...

Excellent article Ian

A few comments

World production is led by Portugal, followed by Spain. Together they cover over 3/4 of world production. Italy, France are both minor producers. Slovenia is not even on the map.

Small cork stopper producers can turn out consistently good product, but these are definitely the exception. For example, our firends Dupere and Barrera use a small producer here in the Var, France. Out of over 100 of their bottles sampled, I have never had a corked bottle. They report that nobody has ever found a corked bottle, and they are quite close to their customers.

I believe that most producers of cork have moved away from chlorine, and are now using peroxide. This seems to have reduced the problem, but not much...

TCA has increased as production of cork becomes more volume oriented and less quality oriented. The above mentioned quality producer respects the basic rules that had always governed cork production in the times prior to the disastrous nationalization of the cork forests in Portugal (they have since been reprivatized, but the damage is permanent). At the time, cork was grown naturally and production respected the very long growth cycle of the cork oak. The first bark was removed after 15 years and DISCARDED, then it took another 15 years to get the first usable bark. Without irrigation, the trees produced tight bands of bark each year, and it took 12-15 years to produce the required thickness. Nowadays, trees are irrigated (think of the environmental consequences, irrigating in areas that are normally arid) and one can produce a usable bark in 8 years or less, but the product does not have the longevity and the suppleness of a real cork. You can actually see the bands on the cork itself, count them: if you see 6-7 bands, it's no good, better corks have 10-12 visible bands.

Another factor is the drying process. Cork bark must be left to dry for a long time in a controlled environment. The huge increase in production means that there is no convenient place to dry this bark, so at best one finds outdoor shelters with a roof but no walls, but most often the stuff is just left out in the open, exposed to sun and rain, maybe with a plastic sheet. I have seen this, in Portugal, in Spain, in Sardinia. THIS is the most likely place to pick up all kinds of nasty things. Mold sets in very quickly, the bark is literally covered in green nasty stuff. In proper conditions, no mold forms and cleaning can be done with less agressive products. Rain might be adding some new reagents (acids?) to the moldy bark.

---------

Slight OT, Ian, I have a mission to ship some Chateau Burbank to you, expect liquid surprise in the mail. Same for you Emery (send me your address please).

Mike

Mike Tommasi, Six Fours, France email link

formatting link

Reply to
Mike Tommasi

Ian, I think you made some very good points.

I think of myself on the less-sensitive end of the spectrum. But tasting with some more sensitive folks has led me to perhaps be a little better at detecting lesser concentrations of TCA. When I encounter a bottle that seems to lack fruit vs. what I expect, I go looking for mustiness. Sometimes I find it, sometimes not. I'd say that my experience is now in the 5-8% range. I find it believable that 10+% of the bottles I drink could be contaminated.

While I am a supporter of switching to screwcaps, I still support better quality control for those that do use natural cork- I never again want to have a corked bottle of Lafleur!

I've also heard some reports that there have been real improvements with some synthetic corks (the extruded ones seem clearly better than the others), and don't mind those on "drink now" wines.

best, Dale

Dale Williams Drop "damnspam" to reply

Reply to
Dale Williams

Very Good article. Thanks. I must not be overly senstive but I did have an inexpensive Gevry Chambartin recently that seemed a bit off. Probably was TCA and my wife drank it. I opened another bottle.

Thanks again.

Reply to
Richard Neidich

] Excellent article Ian ]

Indeed.

][] ] Small cork stopper producers can turn out consistently good product, ] but these are definitely the exception. For example, our firends ] Dupere and Barrera use a small producer here in the Var, France. Out ] of over 100 of their bottles sampled, I have never had a corked ] bottle. They report that nobody has ever found a corked bottle, and ] they are quite close to their customers. ]

This echos a point I also wanted to underline. But I wonder why, at the beyond silly prices at the top of the market, folks aren't using these corks? Surely the incremental cost would be easily absorbed.

[] ] Slight OT, Ian, I have a mission to ship some Chateau Burbank to you, ] expect liquid surprise in the mail. Same for you Emery (send me your ] address please). ]

Ha, I heard that! Tom will be disgusted to learn that I plan to let it sit a full 3 months to recover from bottle shock. Sorry, that's just the way I am. :) (Address under separate cover, thought you already had it.) Can't wait! Hmm, is it under Stelvin?

[] ] >Turning back to bottles, the alternatives to cork are three fold, I think. ] >a) Crown caps (as used for aging champagne), ] >b) synthetic cork shaped closures, which theoretically can be opened with ] >corkscrews, ] >c)Stelvin or other screwcap. ] >

How about the glass stopper technology we discussed here a few years ago? I always thought that sounded very promising, but haven't heard a peep about it since. Lost the link somewhere along the way, IIRC Michael P. provided it back when.

-E

Reply to
Emery Davis

I can only speculate, but either the chlorine is coming from atmospheric pollution (including any pesticides?) or from the storage areas. Like I said, drying in storage takes a long time, and these places must still bear the traces of past contamination.

Mike

Mike Tommasi, Six Fours, France email link

formatting link

Reply to
Mike Tommasi

Just a guess: How about the chlorine in tap water?

M.

Reply to
Michael Pronay

- comes frome the German daugther of ALCOA (themselves producing screw-caps, btw).

They are so overbooked that they can only supply those who were using them last year in the test phase. Don't know about Germany, their home market, but in Austria only two growers got them: Summerer in Langenlois and Sattlerhof in Styria. Summerer has anounced to bottle all under glass.

One restaurateur in Vienna, Walter Bauer from Restaurant Bauer, reports his eployees not being too happy with it since opening is a kind of hassle, too much force is needed. He prefers screwcaps (and buys and sells them easily).

M.

Reply to
Michael Pronay
[An excellent sum-up]

No cork oaks in Slovenia. Mixed-up with Sardinia?

M.

Reply to
Michael Pronay

Salut/Hi Emery Davis,

le/on Fri, 17 Sep 2004 00:08:15 +0200, tu disais/you said:-

Boink!!! (ouch)

Yes indeed, but the essence of the above is "small". While Dupere and Barrera, and some other small scale wineries can get their entire stock of corks from such specialist and honest suppliers, I don't think the supply is enough to fill the demand even from the 1st growth Bordeaux vineyards. I know Michael (Pronay) doesn't agree here, but I still suspect that the level of cork taint in these Chx is lower than it is for the Domain McFilthy in Australia. I cannot imagine that a supplier is going to risk offending prestigious Chx by supplying corks they _know_ to be run of the mill, so will probably have a "special selection" grade for such customers. The fact that even THEY have occasional faulty bottles, shows what a serious problem this taint has become.

If it's anything LIKE as good as the other vintages I've tasted, then you could be well advised to let it age even further.

I'm unconvinced by it, Emery. For two/three main reasons.

  1. Cost & Complexity . The only way you can make glass stoppers fit well enough to prevent all ingress/egress is by individual grinding to shape, unless there is new technology that I missed. And even then I'd be surprised if it worked.
  2. Welding. Ground glass stoppers will weld themselves together when left in position, which rather negates the idea.

What one could imagine, on the other hand, is some variant on the ampoule solution where the top is fused, and one opens the bottle by breaking a neck lower down.

Reply to
Ian Hoare

My list of corked magnums from my own cellar:

1985 Camensac (2x, 4 still left) 1985 Sociando-Mallet (the only one) 1961 Gruaud-Larose (" " " )

M.

Reply to
Michael Pronay

Ian, common wisom has is that all cork selections, gradings etc. are optical *only*. Although I admit that corks with holes etc. might have a slightly higher chance to get tainted, this in no way preculdes even the very top quality corks from being tainted.

Sorry Ian, but this is not the method used. The seal is a ring of synthetic material, PVDC to be exact (polyvinylidene chloride), the same material used as foil in stelvins.

You can even see it here:

M.

Reply to
Michael Pronay

Thank you for taking the time to write this article. I suggest you consider submitting it for publication.

After read>Hi,

-- ================================================Do you like wine? Do you live in South Florida? Visit the MIAMI WINE TASTERS group at

formatting link
================================================

Reply to
Leo Bueno

Well, the guy at Southcorp thinks that TCA is already in the cork while on the tree:

formatting link
Dale

Dale Williams Drop "damnspam" to reply

Reply to
Dale Williams

My partner and I looked at a company called Metacork

formatting link
We showed their closure to a few of the vintners we work with and none were interested. There seems already to be a hierarchy of what is acceptable if it's not cork: glass, synthetic "cork", screw-caps.

At one gathering I heard a particularly riled up fellow who wants there to be rigorous controls of who gets what: best corks to premier wines and on down the quality ladder, with screwcaps to swill (his words, not mine) I'm not sure who he felt should make the decision: by parker points? by his own tastes?

I opened a corked bottle of Kracher last week, no mistaking it. Overall I think we average about 5%, and it's a heartbreak every time.

e.winemonger

formatting link

Reply to
winemonger

I have talked to Alois Kracher some time ago. He eagerly awaits the screwcap to take off, because he has got in his mind to bottle

0.2 litre screw-capped bottles: "The perfect size for two glasses of sweet wines to share, the perfect give-away or impulse buy in a duty-free or similar invironment."

The only problem: He does not want to be the pioneer ...

M.

Reply to
Michael Pronay

Unfortunately the airlines have already ruined that market with the swill that they give out in small bottles. I think a 0.2 litre bottle on the shelf will be associated with the airline junk.

Reply to
Bill Loftin

No, imho. Just because Thunderbird comes in 0.75 litres, that doesn't mean that Lafite & DRC sales are affected.

M.

Reply to
Michael Pronay

DrinksForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.