- posted
9 years ago
"Critics are not objective." (recent article)
- Vote on answer
- posted
9 years ago
It is criticism or opinion. No one says they have to be objective. Sommelier courses teach objectivity but it is still personal taste.
- Vote on answer
- posted
9 years ago
No one can be totally objective, but obviously someone who is a critic should try to remove some of the extraneous factors mentioned. But I also value critics with acknowledged biases and preferences, rather than those that try to rate each wine independently of style. But as to objectivity- from the listed email it seems the columnist is actually an employee of "the Evil Empire" (Southern Wine and Spirits), so we can toss objectivity out of the picture!
- Vote on answer
- posted
9 years ago
How can excellence be truly recognized if critics aren't as objective as possible?
- Vote on answer
- posted
9 years ago
As far as I am concerned, I would be happy if critics were completely objective, but I fear that is too much to ask. If, however, you have become acquainted with a critic's biases over time, his or her opinion can be valuable because you know which correction factor you have to apply in order to obtain an evaluation that fits your own (subjective, of course) taste. I have had great success with this approach in classical music. It should work with wine, too.
Greetings to all, Charley
- Vote on answer
- posted
9 years ago
Probably very true, but could you give some examples?
- Vote on answer
- posted
9 years ago
If critics aren't objective, won't the following situation arise?:
- Men often applaud an imitation and hiss the real thing.
Aesop
- Vote on answer
- posted
9 years ago
- Never judge a critic by your agreement with his likes and dislikes.
George Saintsbury
- Vote on answer
- posted
9 years ago
Can excellence be recognized is critics are not objective?:
- There is no surer mark of the absence of the highest moral and intellectual qualities than a cold reception of excellence.
Philip James Bailey
- Vote on answer
- posted
9 years ago
If critics are not objective, can excellence be recognized?:
- There is no surer mark of the absence of the highest moral and intellectual qualities than a cold reception of excellence.
Philip James Bailey
- Vote on answer
- posted
9 years ago
This is how I use reviews. Know your reviewer and know the region can work as well. I guess there can be objectivity in "a wine from this region tastes like this and this wine is true to this", if the person who says it understands that region.
When I dont know it, I look for words like oaky, earthy, mineral. Or for certain regions - eg cornas and rioja - I look for "old style". Soemtimes I wont agree, but its good indicators.