TN: Mostly 1996 Burgs (including La Tache!) , plus 71 Piedmont, 90 Krug, etc

SOBER at Andy's house last night. He greeted us with a couple bottles of th e 1990 Krug. While my taste runs more to lighter styled Champagne, this is a really fantastic, crisper and brighter than I would have expected. Deep f lavors, spicy, complex. A-

From then on all wines were blind

First flight in the library with sausages and cheese, my first thought was Rhone, but Franco and Dan both got Barolo immediately. Decanted about 3 hou rs previously Wine A : Seemed oxidized at first, bounced back, complex nose with barnyard and leather over red fruit, but never lost (to me, others differed) a surp rising tired edge. 1971 Bartolo Mascarello Barolo. B/B+

Wine B: Fresh, young, gorgeous fruit with forest floor, mushroom, and tea a romas, just a hint of barnyard. 1971 Conterno "Cascina Francia" Barolo. A-

To the dining table, and a white flight paired with a potato-leek soup with creme fraiche Wine #1: Ripe, almost tropical, we were puzzled by ripeness thinking Burgun dy, very good length, I was impressed. 1999 Kongsgaard Chardonnay B+/A-

Wine #2 Gorgeous complex nose, hazelnut, long, lush but balanced. All I wan t in white Burg. Craig gets points for guessing Leroy. 1996 d'Auvenay "les Narvaux " Meursault A-/A

Wine #3 Some oxidative notes but not dying. Nutty, big, a little clunky des pite good acids. 1996 Bouchard Chevalier-Montrachet B

Bonus Wine: Spicy, lots of citrus notes, good acids, a bit smaller framed t han rest of flight. A very nice overachiever. 1996 Dureuil-Janthial Rully B/B+

With a terrine with macerated figs and salad (I think Mark guessed Chamboll e on this flight, a question Andy couldn't answer yes or no, so everyone kn ew the vineyard- so points to Mark for that) Wine #4 Very young, full, black cherries, spice. 1996 Jadot Bonnes-Mares A

-/B+ Wine #5 This was muted at first pour but opened nicely and became a truly great young Burgundy. Red fruits, smoke, sandalwood, exotic yet pure. 1996 Roumier Bonnes-Mares A/A- Wine #6 Great nose, a whirl of spices and fruit, but on the palate seemed l ess attractive than on nose. Still a nice wine. 1996 Vogue Bonnes-Mares. B+

With boeuf bourguignon and noodles Wine #7: High acids even for 1996, red fruit, some tannin, needs time, over shadowed by flightmates. 1996 d'Auvenay Mazis-Chambertin B/B+

Wine #8 Full, brawny but elegant, red fruit, young, tons of potential but t asty young. 1996 Rousseau Chambertin A-

Wine #9 Some question if corked, I didn't get, and others decided whatever blew off. I thought great from start- full, extraordinarily long, young, bl ack cherry and mocha, smoke. 1996 Rousseau Chambertin Clos de Beze A-/A

With a nice cheese course (I only had a little Ossua-Iraty, but there was n ice Morbier, St Nectaire, Comte, etc)

Wine #10 First bottle corked, replaced by a fresh bottle (cooler and of co urse no extra time in decanter). Good fruit, high acids, a bit foursquare. 1996 Jayer-Gilles Echezeaux B Wine #11 Fullest and most open of flight, red fruits, baking spices, a touc h sharp; 1996 Rouget Echezeaux B/B+

Wine #12 Tight, tight, tight. I thought this just shut down, others (more e xperienced than I) just didn't like. Red fruit, a little ashtray note, but I thought there was something coiled underneath. 1996 Rouget Cros Parantou x B-

Andy wasn't happy with the last flight so added a bonus wine: lovely, deep cherry and herb flavors, stony minerality, elegance abounding, Mark gets th e wine quickly. Omigod. 1996 DRC La Tache A

Dessert Wine: deep deep deep gold color, botrytis notes of honey and aprico t, intense and rich. 1996 Doisy-Daene "L'Extravagant" B+/A-

Great night, thanks Andy

Grade disclaimer: I'm a very easy grader, basically A is an excellent wine, B a good wine, C mediocre. Anything below C means I wouldn't drink at a pa rty where it was only choice. Furthermore, I offer no promises of objectivi ty, accuracy, and certainly not of consistency.

Reply to
DaleW
Loading thread data ...

the 1990 Krug. While my taste runs more to lighter styled Champagne, this i s a really fantastic, crisper and brighter than I would have expected. Deep flavors, spicy, complex. A-

s Rhone, but Franco and Dan both got Barolo immediately. Decanted about 3 h ours previously

rd and leather over red fruit, but never lost (to me, others differed) a su rprising tired edge. 1971 Bartolo Mascarello Barolo. B/B+

aromas, just a hint of barnyard. 1971 Conterno "Cascina Francia" Barolo. A

-

th creme fraiche

undy, very good length, I was impressed. 1999 Kongsgaard Chardonnay B+/A-

ant in white Burg. Craig gets points for guessing Leroy. 1996 d'Auvenay "le s Narvaux " Meursault A-/A

espite good acids. 1996 Bouchard Chevalier-Montrachet B

than rest of flight. A very nice overachiever. 1996 Dureuil-Janthial Rull y B/B+

lle on this flight, a question Andy couldn't answer yes or no, so everyone knew the vineyard- so points to Mark for that)

y great young Burgundy. Red fruits, smoke, sandalwood, exotic yet pure. 19

96 Roumier Bonnes-Mares A/A-

less attractive than on nose. Still a nice wine. 1996 Vogue Bonnes-Mares. B+

ershadowed by flightmates. 1996 d'Auvenay Mazis-Chambertin B/B+

tasty young. 1996 Rousseau Chambertin A-

r blew off. I thought great from start- full, extraordinarily long, young, black cherry and mocha, smoke. 1996 Rousseau Chambertin Clos de Beze A-/A

nice Morbier, St Nectaire, Comte, etc)

course no extra time in decanter). Good fruit, high acids, a bit foursquare . 1996 Jayer-Gilles Echezeaux B

uch sharp; 1996 Rouget Echezeaux B/B+

experienced than I) just didn't like. Red fruit, a little ashtray note, b ut I thought there was something coiled underneath. 1996 Rouget Cros Parant oux B-

p cherry and herb flavors, stony minerality, elegance abounding, Mark gets the wine quickly. Omigod. 1996 DRC La Tache A

cot, intense and rich. 1996 Doisy-Daene "L'Extravagant" B+/A-

e, B a good wine, C mediocre. Anything below C means I wouldn't drink at a party where it was only choice. Furthermore, I offer no promises of objecti vity, accuracy, and certainly not of consistency.

Wow, what a great lineup and mostly A and B ratings too. And your friend ju st threw in a bonus La Tache. Again, wow.

Reply to
lleichtman

just threw in a bonus La Tache. Again, wow.

Yes, generous guy! OK, so backstory is Andy devised this as an experiment after this Parker co mment on a board: ".I would suggest you be careful with 1996 Burgundy....many of the whites a re already dead and oxidized and the reds...even the bigger ones, are losin g what little fruit they once had and what is left is a skeleton of acidity and tannin(Meadows and merchants are not going to tell you this)...the cul prit...at least for the reds, was apparent once the official yields were an nounced for each village....excessive yields per hectare was a warning sign at the vintage's inception...a prediction..in a decade, the reds will be l argely a disaster, and discredited..."

OK, while these '96 whites showed well, we all know re Premox. So some vali dity there- but the Premox issue seems to have hit every vintage 95-2006 at least to some degree.

But hard to see with the reds. There were some that showed comparatively po orly (especially for the price tags on the J-Gilles and Rougets, but even t here not convinced that time won't help) but overall I thought these were g reat and moving in the right direction. Some there had some mixed experienc es with '96s, but while it might not be the most homogeneous vintage, I wou ld call it a rousing success, and have trouble believing these will be "dis asters"

Not that anyone uses Parker as a Burg guru

Reply to
DaleW

d just threw in a bonus La Tache. Again, wow.

comment on a board:

are already dead and oxidized and the reds...even the bigger ones, are los ing what little fruit they once had and what is left is a skeleton of acidi ty and tannin(Meadows and merchants are not going to tell you this)...the c ulprit...at least for the reds, was apparent once the official yields were announced for each village....excessive yields per hectare was a warning si gn at the vintage's inception...a prediction..in a decade, the reds will be largely a disaster, and discredited..."

lidity there- but the Premox issue seems to have hit every vintage 95-2006 at least to some degree.

poorly (especially for the price tags on the J-Gilles and Rougets, but even there not convinced that time won't help) but overall I thought these were great and moving in the right direction. Some there had some mixed experie nces with '96s, but while it might not be the most homogeneous vintage, I w ould call it a rousing success, and have trouble believing these will be "d isasters"

I know merchants won't tell you but why not from Allen Meadows. Our tasting group here has had poor experience with some of the "96's so your results to me are encouraging. We have long since stopped drinking older white burg undies as our results have been terrible. One out of 3 bottles oxidized 94-

2006.
Reply to
lleichtman

DrinksForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.