Hi all!
Just getting into wine, and in my research (I'm an obsessive researcher) came up with a quick question, and I hope you knowledgable people may be able to offer an opinion.
It seems that the general thinking is that the "vines must suffer" in order to make great wines. Now since the Australians have had such a hard time, and their production is way down on what is expected, does this mean that the quality of the wines will be higher, as the vines have suffered more? Or has it been the wrong kind on suffering?
Any opinions would be more than welcome!
Thanks,
Tibbs