Just Don't Get It--Bordeaux

Just returned from a very pleasant interlude in Durango CO. (Yes, I rode the train.) Had a several excellent meals, including two nights at Ariana's Italian which may boast the best veal scallopine presentations west of NYC, a tour of Asian-eclectic/American traditional at Ken & Sue's (imagine meatload, maple-mustard glazed NY strip, nori-wrapped lobster/avocado rolls, and a variety of soy, lemon-grass, wasabi-enhanced, Szechuan/Hunan/Mandarin concoctions.)

The big night was a French shot at Chez Grandmere--a delightful small house near the train depot, decorated in country French and offering some very traditional French cuisine executed perfectly (if a bit overly salted.)

The wine list at Grandmere got them a WS Award of Excellence, probably because of the availability of things like a DRC 1985 burg at $5975/bottle!

There were a number of great Bordeaux offerings and I'm not one to pass up an opporunity to explore. With duck breast and lingonberry/red-wine reduction for me and "rack" of lamb (actually two chops) with port-wine sauce for SWMBO, a bordeaux seemed reasonable. The waiter (who was otherwise incredibly competent and knowledgeable) provided little assistance when I asked for advice in choosing between a '99 Baron Pichon-Longuiville and a '00 Chateau Lascombes which were in my price range and separated by $10.

He went to the chef/owner and returned pronouncing the Lascombes as definitely superior due to the vintage. I didn't get to meet or talk to the recommendor. (I'm sure Ian, Dale, Michael and others will agree that is a faux pas.)

The wine was nice (applying the adjective as an underwhelming comment), but I simply don't get the value of the French over a California cab. There was a nice color, a pleasant nose and a warm, but not huge dark berry flavor. A bit of tannin pucker on the finish, but not a harshness of immaturity. It wasn't an unpleasant wine, by a long shot, but it simply didn't impress as something remarkable or memorable. A '00 Cakebread Cellars cab that I'd had a couple of months before for $40/bottle less was much more impressive, as was a Shaffer cab that I'd enjoyed in June.

What am I missing or is it simply a question of the Bordeaux needing a lot more years before it really begins to display something?

Ed Rasimus Fighter Pilot (USAF-Ret) "When Thunder Rolled" "Phantom Flights, Bangkok Nights" Both from Smithsonian Books

***
formatting link
Reply to
Ed Rasimus
Loading thread data ...

Hi Ed:

First of all, my guess is Cakebread CS retails for more than the $40 that the '99 Pichon-Baron or '00 Lascombes do. :)

As I stated in reply to Emery in the Laguna thread, my experience is that the majority of the classed-growth Bdx are in a very closed state right now. 1999 is a lesser vintage, but better now if you can't do a 24 hour decant.

As to Lascombes in particular, don't think I had the 2000. I've often found it to be one of the estates that has given Margaux an iffy rep compared to the other major appelations in Bdx, but I've heard they've improved. And Margaux did seem to do well in 2000.

Better luck next time! Dale

Dale Williams Drop "damnspam" to reply

Reply to
Dale Williams

Both California wines that you metntion are fairly lush and fruity. Perhaps you just prefer that style of wine. Certainly the French wines often need a bit more time than their California counterparts but generally speaking their two different animals. Bi!!

Reply to
RV WRLee
Reply to
Anders Tørneskog

DrinksForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.