TN: Blind St Julien, with surprises

Last night a nice group got together at Riverpark a blind tasting of wines from St. Julien. My train was late, so I scurried down to find myself the l ast to arrive. There was a blind white to start, some oak, pear fruit, good acids. II took a stab and got lucky with Jura Chardonnay. It's the 2012 Do maine du Pelican Arbois Chardonnay apparently a partnership including d'Ang erville, I like, but not appreciably better than the Tissot Empreinte at ha lf the price. B+/B Restaurant did a nice job, good service. I enjoyed the charcuterie, fish ta cos, and the rabbit (though when they said 1/2 a rabbit, I didn't expect 1/

2 a newborn) :)

On to the blind St Julien

Wine #1 : Elegant, soft, mature. B+

Wine #2- Quite barnyardy at first, very full-fruited, gets cleaner, pretty classic ripe vintage Medoc. A-

Wine #3- a bit sharp and lean at first, lots of acid, I liked a lot more wi th some time in glass. B+/A-

Wine #4 - funky, we discussed whether it was corked or just musty, cork bec ame clearer. NR

Wine #5 - Herby/funky, good fruit, I thought the finish a bit drying, but l iked more later. B+

Wine #6 - Ripest so far, a bit California-y, plump. B/B+

Wine #7- Barnyard, fruit opens way up, goes from middle of pack to one of m y favorites on re-taste. A-

Wine #8 - weird, maderized, probably seen some heat. C-

Wine #9 - Brett/bandaid, a bit clipped, midbodied, better than #8 C+/B-

Wine #10- Ripe, soft without being flabby, very good A-/B+

Wine #11 Young, sweet, ripe. B+/A-

Before revealing we did 3/2/1 voting. I lost vote sheet, but #2 (first bott le of 90 LLC) won easily, with #10 ('99 Poyferre) edging #7 (82 Gruaud) for 2nd. Most non-flawed wines got some votes.

Wine #1 1970 Leoville Las Cases

Wine #2 1990 Leoville Las Cases (Winner)

Wine #3 1986 Gruaud Larose

Wine #4 1966 Ducru-Beaucaillou

Wine #5 1990 Leoville Las Cases (4th place)

Wine #6 - 1990 Gruaud Larose

Wine #7 1982 Gruaud Larose (3rd place)

Wine #8 1975 Leoville Las Cases

Wine #9 1981 Ducru-Beaucaillou

Wine #10 1999 Leoville Poyferre (2nd place)

Wine #11 1961 Beychevelle

Grade disclaimer: I'm a very easy grader, basically A is an excellent wine, B a good wine, C mediocre. Anything below C means I wouldn't drink at a pa rty where it was only choice.Furthermore, I offer no promises of objectivit y, accuracy, and certainly not of consistency.

Reply to
DaleW
Loading thread data ...

s from St. Julien. My train was late, so I scurried down to find myself the last to arrive. There was a blind white to start, some oak, pear fruit, go od acids. II took a stab and got lucky with Jura Chardonnay. It's the 2012 Domaine du Pelican Arbois Chardonnay apparently a partnership including d'A ngerville, I like, but not appreciably better than the Tissot Empreinte at half the price. B+/B

tacos, and the rabbit (though when they said 1/2 a rabbit, I didn't expect

1/2 a newborn) :)

y classic ripe vintage Medoc. A-

with some time in glass. B+/A-

ecame clearer. NR

liked more later. B+

my favorites on re-taste. A-

ttle of 90 LLC) won easily, with #10 ('99 Poyferre) edging #7 (82 Gruaud) f or 2nd. Most non-flawed wines got some votes.

e, B a good wine, C mediocre. Anything below C means I wouldn't drink at a party where it was only choice.Furthermore, I offer no promises of objectiv ity, accuracy, and certainly not of consistency.

Was the storage on the 1975 Leoville less than perfect? We recently tasted the '75 and it was still holding well.

Reply to
lleichtman

Was the storage on the 1975 Leoville less than perfect? We recently tasted the '75 and it was still holding well.

sorry, I meant to reply to group. Yes, I think storage was issue. The guy who brought is meticulous (he builds high end custom wine cellars for a living) but this was bought on secondary market, he was first to say cooked

Reply to
Dale W

DrinksForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.