Ale or Lager, I'm confused

Ok, on the bottle of Salvator Double Bock, it says Ale. I thought Double Bocks were lagers. What's the deal?

Reply to
bluestringer
Loading thread data ...

Beers above a certain alcohol percentage have to be labelled as ales or malt liquors in some states. Or some such nonsense. ;^)

Best regards, Bill PS: Got that info from Brewser83 last month.

Reply to
Bill Becker

I have been collecting beer cans since 1977 and the different state laws require certain beers to be labeled in certain ways. In one state "ice beer" may be listed as beer with alcohol by volume. In another state it may be labeled as ale, or have the alcohol listed by weight. This usually happens on higher alcohol brews. I picked up a 5 liter can of Konig-pils that was labeled as malt liquor (that was in Kentucky). I hope that helps.

Reply to
Brewser83

Yeah in Texas it's an alcohol content thing. Totally stupid and only contributes to the people's confusion. I forget what the percentage is but anything over a certain abv% has to be labelled an ale. That's why Hofbrauhaus Original Lager says ale in small letters on the label. Dumb.

_Randal

Reply to
Randal Chapman

On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 09:51:16 -0500, Randal Chapman wrote (in article ):

It's dumber than you think. When referring to Ale or Lager all your referencing is the type of yeast that is used. Ale is a top fermenting yeast. Lager is a bottom fermenting yeast. Every beer is either an Ale or a Lager. The style of beer refers to the difference inside those two types of yeast. It's easy to understand except it seems for politicians who have trouble understanding anything.

It has nothing to do with style, alcohol content or ingredients. You can use exactly the same ingredients to make an Ale & a Lager. It just depends on what yeast you use. Even when using the same ingredients the yeast will determine the overall flavors of your final product. Brew a batch and split it in two. Use an Ale yeast in one and a lager yeast in the other. You'll be surprised at the total difference in character between the two.

The Ale yeasts will give you more aroma and after taste while a Lager yeast will give you more opening flavor with a clean after taste and very little aroma.

Reply to
oDDz Bodtkin

On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 19:48:36 GMT, oDDz Bodtkin wrote, in an amusing display of pedantry:

[asking innocently:] So what type of beer is a lambic? Or a steam beer? Is an beer pitched with lager yeast but fermented at warm temperatures, and not held at lagering temperatures, still a lager? And then there's German Alt and Koelsch, both of which are fermented with top-working yeast, but are lagered too. What to do, what to do?

Even the yeast!

Guess what "lager" yeast can do at warm temperatures? Positively "ale" like, I tells ya. It's amazing.

Usually. See above. Drink Anchor Steam - or remember Rainier Ale, back in the good ol' days. Be amazed.

Really? If you warm-ferment them both, and don't cold-condition either one, they'll be totally different? You sure about that?

So a lager yeast won't behave similarly to ale yeast at warm ferment temps, eh? Wow, you know so much about brewing. Really a lot!

Reply to
Oh, Guess

On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 19:43:16 -0500, Oh, Guess wrote (in article ):

Are you a complete idiot or just a moron? Never mind it's obvious your just an asshole that's never done any brewing.

PLONK!

Reply to
oDDz Bodtkin

Can't trim your post or answer the question, asshat? Questions too tough for you?

Wrong. And it's pretty obvious you don't know half as much as you think you do about the subject, and can't defend your assertions, ya big pussy.

Aw, I'm crushed. Your stunning knowledge of brewing would have contributed so much to the world, even if it's lacking in a few areas.

Reply to
Oh, Guess

Strange thing is, he's right. (And he knows the difference between "your" and "you're.")

Better plonk the whole group. Ignorance is bliss, so you'll be blissfully happy that way.

Reply to
Joel

Applying the Reinheistgebot to beers outside of Germany would end up with most of what's produced in the world not being counted as beer, including from great brewing countries like Belgium and England. Sticking with the broader definition of an alcoholic beverage made from fermented cereal grains, it certainly qualifies.

Actually, lager is S. uvarum (or S. carlsbergensis, in older nomenclature). Brettanomyces is its own, not-really-related family.

S. cerevisiae is actually ale yeast.

Tough to isolate a particular flavor to a particular microbe in the case of lambics, not least of which is because the vast majority are blended. And various bacteria, especially lactic bacteria, contribute as much if not more to the flavor profile than the various yeasts present.

I don't see any lager yeast in lambic (referencing above, where lager is a very specific species of yeast, and not a category per se, unless the taxonomy has changed in the past few years). Lambic's a hodge-podge of microflora. And it's distinct enough that it arguably deserves its own category outside ale and lager. And, as I mentioned before, to me the difference between ale and lager is much more one of fermentation process than it is yeast selection. Which, in my opinion, makes the case of its own unique category even stronger.

-Steve

Reply to
Steve Jackson

Begin Bill Becker quote:

; Beers above a certain alcohol percentage have to be labelled as ales or malt ; liquors in some states. ; Or some such nonsense. ;^)

Even though the difference is the type of yeast and not the resulting alcohol content?

Reply to
Jeffrey Kaplan

Another pissing contest over whose brewing-knowledge-dick is bigger. Wow, how cool.

Reply to
Lew Bryson

Yes. In states like Texas, the type of yeast has no meaning to the politicos who passed the laws on beer labeling; alcohol content was the deciding factor, so "strong" beers are ales, "weak" beers are beers.

Reply to
Oh, Guess

Except to you, of course. You already know all there is to know.

In other words, anyone who dares to question your high and mighty expertise on things regarding beer and brewing. Excuse me if I don't bow and scrape and regard you as the grand poobah of all things beer. You might want to do something about that thin skin thing you got goin' on, though. Gonna plonk everyone who doesn't worship at your all-knowing altar?

Reply to
dgs

Begin Oh, Guess quote:

; Yes. In states like Texas, the type of yeast has no meaning to the ; politicos who passed the laws on beer labeling; alcohol content was ; the deciding factor, so "strong" beers are ales, "weak" beers are ; beers.

Yuck. But then again, that is the home state of Shrubya.

Reply to
Jeffrey Kaplan

unfotuntaely the people who determine these things couldnt remove their heads from their asses with GPS and a support team

Reply to
The artist formerly Known as B

You can see it that way if you like. Or you can see an effort to educate.

Reply to
Joel

lol.

Reply to
Bill Becker

DrinksForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.