Traditionally and typically, tea is sold as deriving from a named area. This gives the buyer a prime clue as to type, character, and expected quality.
I have just noticed a news item that may give consternation to these traditionalists:
>snip>>>
The Zimbabwean tea company "Tanganda" has announced that it is to establish tea plantations in Mozambique as part of its expansion plans, reports Friday's issue of the Maputo daily "Noticias". The company's managing director, Andrew Mills, revealed that Tanganda has completed feasibility studies, and has decided to establish the plantations in Mozambican soil, but the tea will be processed in Zimbabwe.
>>unsnip>>>>
Will this tea then be classified a Mozambican or a Zimbabwian? Is tea from Darjeeling grown leaf, transported by truck to, and processed in Assam - a Darjeeling or an Assam? I suspect the Tea Board of India would accept neither classification.
And as a quizzical afterthought - how many of the "Senchas" available now actually derive from China, processed in Chinese/Japanese joint venture built factories processing Japanese bushes growing in China? There are apparently at least 80 such factories.
Nigel at Teacraft