Whisky blends better 36 years ago

My father used to run a pub in Devon 36 years ago. When he left he kept a few bottles of Scotch as a leaving present to himself. One was a standard bottle of Teachers and another was 'The original Mackinlay'.

36 years later and I've had the pleasure of drinking both of them. They taste MUCH better than their modern counterparts. I thought that whisky didn't develop in the bottle? If that is correct then the only explanation is that the blenders were far better at their jobs back then or the quality of the single malts used in them has declined in recent years?

Any thoughts?

Reply to
Tony Ferris
Loading thread data ...

Or they are blending for a different market now.

Reply to
the man with no idea

We know that whisky doesn't age in the bottle. So if the taste was different then (lets assume is was better) does that mean that today's market is one that has less of a discriminating set of taste buds? Certainly today's market is more susceptible to the marketing hype that we get buried in today and also end up believing (sadly). That is one of the reasons that single malt scotch is such a rage today and why there are so many new bottlings on the market. Personally I would tend to believe that the quality of most products today isn't as they once were. Some are better and some worse. In the case of malt scotch I'd tend to believe that it is worse than it once was and therefore the taste has gone done hill a bit.

DaveS

Reply to
DaveS

DrinksForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.