1:3:4:2 sight : smell : taste : overall tasting guide

Below is tasting guide I compiled from other folks' guides. Particularly, I would like comments on the relative weights (1:3:4:2) allocated to the four components (sight, smell, taste, overall) on the

10-point scale.

I have tried these weights only on a few wines so far. A score of 6 seems to indicated a pleasant product.

Do these weights make sense or is there a better proportion? I look forward to your feedback.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tasting Guide

SIGHT (Appearance) (0-1 points) Consider clarity, brilliance and appropriateness of color. Downgrade for haze or opacity. If sparkling, consider persistence of the bubbles and pinpoint size.

CLARITY - cloudy, bitty, hazy, opaque, dull, clear, brilliant DEPTH - watery, pale, medium, deep, dark COLOR/HUE - (white wines) green tinge, pale yellow, yellow, gold, amber, brown (red wines) purple, purple/red, red, red/brown VISCOSITY - slight sparkle, watery, normal, heavy, thin, oily DESCRIPTION: straw, amber, tawny, ruby, garnet

SMELL (Aroma/Bouquet) (0-3 points) Is it pleasant or unappetizing? What specific aromas can you identify? Consider both fruit smells and other aroma qualities that may result from oak or bottle age.

GENERAL APPEAL - neutral, clean, attractive, outstanding, off (e.g. yeasty, acetic, oxidized, woody, etc.) FRUIT AROMA - none, slight, positive, identifiable (e.g. Riesling) BOUQUET - none, pleasant, complex, powerful DESCRIPTION: cedar, cigar box, woody, corky, flowery, smoky, honeyed, lemony, spicy, moldy, sulphury, chemical, pungent, oxidized, microbiological, floral, spicy, fruity, vegetative, nutty, caramelized, earthy

TASTE (Flavor/Palate) (0-4 points) Is it "dry" or sweet? Full-bodied or light? Is it appropriately acidic (sour), tongue-twistingly sour, or lacking acid ("flabby")? Does the flavor seem consistent with the aroma? Does it remind you of any specific fruit or other flavor? Is the flavor appropriate to this wine? Finally, is the "finish" or "aftertaste," the flavor remaining in your mouth after you swallow, short, medium or long in duration?

SWEETNESS (white wines) - bone-dry, dry, medium-dry, medium-sweet, sweet, very sweet TANNIN (red wines) - bitter, astringent, hard, dry, soft FRUIT - highly extracted, rich, luscious, deep, disappearing or drying out, gone ACIDITY - flat, refreshing, marked, tart, sour BODY - very light and thin, light, medium, full-bodied, heavy LENGTH (FINISH) - short, acceptable, extended, lingering, layered BALANCE - unbalanced, good, very well, perfect TEXTURE - creamy, silky, elegant, big DESCRIPTION: apply, bitter, blackcurrants, burnt, caramel, earthy, fat, flinty, green, heady, inky, flabby, mellow, metallic, moldy, nutty, salty, silky, sappy, spicy, fleshy, woody, watery

OVERALL (Quality) (0-2 points) After the aftertaste has faded, what do you think of the wine overall? Is it pleasant and appealing? Simple or complex? Are all the components in balance. Does it make you want another sip? In short, do you like it?

IMPRESSION - coarse, poor, acceptable, fine, outstanding DESCRIPTION: supple, fine, elegant, harmonious, rich, delicate, complex

TOTAL (0-10 points) Your final score, the total of the four elements above, "grades" the wine on your personal scoring form.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-- ======================================================= Do you like wine? Do you live in South Florida? Visit the MIAMI WINE TASTERS group at

formatting link

======================================================= Why do you pay outrageous prices for pet products at the Vet's office?

Please try VetAmerica.com

formatting link

1-866-838-6337 (toll free)

Use "tioleo" as your discount code at checkout to receive 10% off your purchases (No, I don't get a commission; it's my niece's business) Flat-Rate Shipping. No hidden charges! $5.50 per order Standard Ground (4-5 days) $10.00 per order Express (2-3 days) $24.00 per order Overnight (1 day)

=======================================================

Reply to
Leo Bueno
Loading thread data ...

Score are always a problem. Personally, I feel that the use of scoring systems are applicable only to generic wines for mass consumption. For the wines that interest me (those that express terroir, that have not been overly homogenized using oenological techniques, those where you do not try to hide the effects of the vintage), scores are totally meaningless.

The weighted score is also flawed, because you assume that the weights are the same for all wines and all people.

Also, what is meant by taste, you mean balance I suppose? Because taste (what your tongue detects) is nothing more than acidity and sweetness, when it comes to wine. Giving balance a higher weight than smell seems very strange.

Smell, is it just the intensity of the aromas, or their quality, or their complexity?

And why put overall impression, when you have already deconstructed the wine into 3 senses? Overall seems like a fudge factor to me... you see, if you are going to get into scoring (and I am not sure of the benefits of this), then you have to at least be consistent.

Bye

Mike

Reply to
Mike Tommasi

DrinksForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.