Calif Pinot Noir in the L.A. Times

On Wednesday, the Times had an interesting article on California Pinot Noir. The distinguished panel had a comprehensive tasting of Pinots and these were their recommendations.

2002 Avila, San Luis Opispo, $10

2002 Leaping Lizard, Los Carneros, $10

2002 Three Saints, Santa Maria Valley, $16

2001 Dierberg, Santa Maria Valley, $28

2001 Melville, Carrie's Vineyard, Santa Barbara County, $43

formatting link

You may need to register for access but its free and without junk mail.

Reply to
Larry B
Loading thread data ...

Thanks, but it's a shame they didn't list the entire lineup!

Dimitri

Reply to
D. Gerasimatos

Greetings Tom;

Many of the comments on the general attributes of the California PN could be applied to the Ontario product perhaps with the exception of high alcohol content because of our generally cooler climate and shorter growing season.

Perhaps we should expect these kind of results because of the notorious difficulty with this grape and should content ourselves with only finding the odd "star". We keep searching and hoping.

To this end I note that the Ontario Wine Society - Niagara Branch is holding a horizontal PN tasting at the Niagara College Teaching Winery in St. Catharines on April 27.

The search goes on!

Reply to
Chuck Reid

It's just as informative to know what *not* to buy, and maybe more so when that list is longer than the "recommend" list. I am curious if they tried Siduri, Peter Michael, Flowers, or Rochioli for example. The article doesn't give a frame of reference as to what was tried and what was not and the winners are rather meaningless without that context.

Dimitri

Reply to
D. Gerasimatos

I did miss this passage. I think Bonaccorsi might still fall in that category.

Thanks for pointing it out.

Dimitri

Reply to
D. Gerasimatos

I don't doubt this is a flavorful wine, but I do have issues with wine that is that high in alcohol. I know these issues have been discussed before here and that the California sunshine and late harvest have a lot to do with it, but I still find these alcohol levels a bit high.

dcr

Reply to
David Rheault

"David Rheault" wrote in news:402432a5$0$20039$ snipped-for-privacy@news.rcn.com:

I agree. PN at +15% (heck at +13%!) is wrong, it's just wrong...

d:D

Reply to
dei

Here is a possible antidote:

"California produces Dolly Parton wines, but Oregon is Juliette Binoche," Lett says. The taste of Sunshine State pinot can often be jammy, almost stewed-except in cooler regions such as Carneros and the Russian River Valley, where the fruit doesn't over-ripen. By contrast, Oregon pinots show more of the reserve and finesse of their Burgundian ancestors. Cool-climate pinot is also higher in acidity, which makes it more food-friendly-especially with the lighter fare (chicken, fish and ethnic-fusion dishes) that people like these days. And it's lower in alcohol, on average 10-12%, compared to the monster cabernets and shirazes grown in warmer climates that can weigh in at 14% or more. "If you just want alcohol, for God's sake have a martini," says Lett.

formatting link

dcr

Reply to
David Rheault

The article did mention that these are either new wineries or new designations from existing wineries. That narrows it down a lot.

Tom S

Reply to
Tom S

Not quite. His first vintage was 1999.

Tom S

Reply to
Tom S

I disagree with that as a flat assertion. I've tasted 15+% Pinot Noirs that are so well balanced that the high alcohol isn't all that obvious. IOW, the wine has to be big in _all_ dimensions, or it won't taste right.

OTOH, it's nearly impossible for a low alcohol Pinot Noir (~10%) to taste balanced. They usually taste thin.

Tom S

Reply to
Tom S

DrinksForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.