TN: 2 Bordeaux on the 18th floor

Sunday was a lovely day, I took train to city and met Betsy after performance. We walked around Upper West Side and Central Park, then headed to a friend's apartment for dinner. There are plusses and minusses for rent stabilization, but tonight it was a plus for us- a beautiful penthouse terrace with glorious views and great plantings would be out of the reach of an orchestral musician at market rents! Great afternoon twilighted into lovely evening, we enjoyed a Turkish meal (lamb chops, rice, vegetables, hummus, etc), and a couple of Bordeaux:

2001 Ch. Giscours (Margaux) This had been opened though not decanted for quite a while before opening. Blackcurrants and black berries, some flowers and a hint of vanilla on the nose. Not big on the palate, but not thin either - a nice super-middleweight. Fleshy black fruit, a little tobacco, a bit of graphite. B+

2003 Smith Haut Lafite (Pessac-Leognan) As expected, more modern. Unsure I could pick this out as Bordeaux blind. Very low acid, thick red fruit, a bit jammy. Big tannins, big whack of lumber on the nose. Now that I've got the dissing out of the way, I'll confess as it got some air I liked better. Oak integrated at least partially, tannins eased, and the fruit held up- very fat, but a step above flabby. Not my favorite, but I think fans of the style would like much more. B-

Fun night in a lovely setting, and I enjoyed the conversation (though as the only non-musician I was occasionally lost).

Grade disclaimer: I'm a very easy grader, basically A is an excellent wine, B a good wine, C mediocre. Anything below C means I wouldn't drink at a party where it was only choice. Furthermore, I offer no promises of objectivity, accuracy, and certainly not of consistency

Reply to
DaleW
Loading thread data ...

The 2003 white wine from Smith Haut Lafitte is a monster, also. Giant fruit and an amazing amount of wood. Atypical, also, but delicious. The 2004 is quite austere by comparison.

Mark Slater

Reply to
Tire-Bouchon

I collected a few Giscours each of 2000 thru 2004 (still holding back on the '05's). I agree that they are generally 'medium bodied' but a satisfying wine (at a decent price). But I would recommend the '03 and '04 over any of the prior years. The wine got a a little bolder and more full bodied with those vintages.

Reply to
AxisOfBeagles

Glad to hear a good report on this, I've got 3 bottles but have never tasted... Any guess for prime drinking window?

Thanks,

-E

Reply to
Emery Davis

I tend to find oak more bothersome in whites than reds, but someone else also called the '03 blanc tasty. Thanks

Reply to
DaleW

Well, of course I only own '01 and '02 :( But Giscours is included in lineup for my groups 2004 survey next month. Least I'll try it then!

Reply to
DaleW

This is not exactly classically styled, so doubt its like the '79, plugging along at 28. I've marked mine for 2012-2017, but who really knows? I hope 5-10 gets it into more secondary aromas.

Reply to
DaleW

A great candidate for "house wine" is La Sirene de Giscours 2003, the

2ieme etiquette. Great moderate price, plump, juicy and aromatic. Very easy drinking right now.

Mark Slater

Reply to
Tire-Bouchon

DrinksForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.