TN Chateau Lafite-Rothschild 1970

The Chateau Lafite-Rothschild 1970 was properly stored since release, and had a good cork and high fill. It is still holding quite well, and is now better balanced than it once was. The once hard tannins are now resolved, there is enough acid, and there is still plenty of fruit. It has developed a very nice bottle bouquet that enhances the fruit. It has considerable old vine character. This wine is not as bad as some would have you believe, if it has been very well stored. It is true that Lafite had a slump in quality in much of the 60s and 70s, and many of their wines of that era were not up to first growth standards. However, although lacking the complexity and concentration of a great Lafite such as the 1959, this wine still is drinking very well. It is better than the 1970 Chateau Margaux. Mouton 1970 is more concentrated, but not a lot better than the 70 Lafite, although it may be more to the taste of some. Of course all of the mentioned 1970 first growths are far behind the very great 1970 Latour, if it has been well stored. I have both single bottles and magnums of 1970 Lafite left, and I see no reason to be in a great hurry to drink them.

Reply to
cwdjrxyz
Loading thread data ...

Ah, the pleasures of a great cellar.

Reply to
Lawrence Leichtman

Interesting. I've tasted this wine many times and always thought it tasted tired and older than its years, even in the 80's.

Mark

Reply to
Tire Bouchon

Tasting notes for this wine have been mixed over the years. Back in the 70s many Bordeaux wines were not all bottled at one time and all of the casks were not always blended together before bottling. Also storage conditions vary can greatly. I have tasted this wine many times since I bought a case of it and 6 magnums shortly after release of the wine. It went through a slump for many years. However at least mine finally became better after many years and the tannins began to resolve. The bottle bouquet that developed after many years tended to make up for the lack of fruit apparent in middle age. I only bought 6 bottles of Latour on release, and in hindsight of course I wish I had bought a case and 6 magnums of Latour instead of Lafite. At least I have six bottles of 70 Latour which I have not even tasted yet. With auction prices reported to be even higher than for 70 Petrus in the UK for 70 Latour, I could not afford to buy any 70 Latour now. The first growth Bordeauxs of 1970 were selling in the $US 20 range when I bought them. The first growth 61s sold for about $US 11 early on. The mentioned prices were high for the time. However they were very much less, even adjusted for inflation, than the price of recent first growths on release.

Reply to
cwdjrxyz

I have found this wine to be lacking in weight, although not always in charm.

To compare it even favourably withthe Margaux of that vintage is to damn with very faint priase - the Margaux was ....crap, and weak acidic crap at that.

Most 1970 Lafite will be showing high variability now.

Reply to
Bill S.

Of course this wine is light weight compared with the best years of Lafite and the 1970 Latour or Mouton for that matter. But then, Lafite is known more for complexity than heavy weight compared with Mouton or Latour, for example. More recent vintages may have become more Parker- like than in the past. However I find my 1970 Lafite a quite decent food wine - there is nothing about it that offends - it is just not up to what one would expect for a first growth.

I agree the 1970 Margaux was not very good. However I find the 1975 Margaux even worse, and I would rather have mineral water than it. Fortunately I only bought 4 bottles of 1970 Margaux and 3 bottles of

1975 Margaux on release.
Reply to
cwdjrxyz

DrinksForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.