TN: many Montrose

Aug 19, 2009 5 Replies

Inevitably, when it's 90+ degrees, one's thoughts turn to Bordeaux. Wait, did I say that? Well, inevitably, some 90+ day each summer, I find myself heading to a Bordeaux tasting and thinking "am I nuts?" Luckily, dylan Prime has decent AC, so after a while I was ready to face red meat and many vintages of Montrose.



While we waited for all (well, almost all) to gather, we tried the



1998 Muller-Catoir Haardter Mandelring Scheurebe Spatlese. An old friend, holding on, though I wouldn't hold much longer. Tropical fruit cocktail with a squirt of grapefruit and lime, sweet and rich but lively. B+

Flight one (with pork belly tater tots)


1964 Ch. Montrose A little iodine-y at first sniff, but a nice middle-framed mature Bordeaux, surprisingly young blackcurrant fruit, earth, a little gamy, I like. B+/A-


1966 Ch. Montrose Solid, smokey, good fruit, good concentration and length. Completely mature yet vibrant, my WOTN. A-


1970 Ch. Montrose I had variable bottles of this, and this was not one of the best despite good fill. Some barnyard, slightly pruney fruit, a repour later is a bit fresher, but a third pour is past it. B-

Flight Two (coincided with my appetizer, a modern version of Caprese salad. As usual in steakhouses, no good Bordeaux matching appetizers, but I thought "hey, it's tomato season." Well, not if they've been in the fridge).


1978 Ch. Montrose Surprise of the night, great showing for this wine. Before it's poured, Paul says it smells like bubblegum, and damn if he isn't right. Not there once poured, though. Sweet fruit and leather, pleasantly herby, decent length, good acids, though it faded a bit in time. B+


1982 Ch. Montrose Slightly high toned at first, lots of tobacco and earth, solid black plum and currant fruit, iron filings, not an acclaimed '82 but very good showing. A-/B+



Flight Three (with my ribeye)


1989 Ch. Montrose Some thought this corked, I didn't get TCA, but I found it off. One could sense a big impressive wine, but there was an offnote I couldn't get past. B-/C+, but I don't think correct bottle.


1990 Ch. Montrose I've had bottles of this that were like tripping in pasture and landing facefirst in the poop, but this only has a hint of barnyard. Sweet cassis and blackberry fruit, good length, needs time. B+/A-



Flight Four


1995 Ch. Montrose Surprisingly forward and ready, good Cabernet fruit, quite good though maybe finish a tad clipped. B+


1996 Ch. Montrose I found nose a little strange (Paul said like artificially buttered popcorn, but I didn't get that). Redder fruit, lush, not very '96ish to me. Still, a quite decent Cabernet. B


2000 Ch. Montrose A bit closed, needs time, but impressive balance of black fruits, refreshing acids, and ripe tannins. Lots (LOTS) of potential/ A-/B+


2003 Ch. Montrose I was looking forward to trying this, but I'm having trouble finding words. It was ethereal, almost like it wasn't even there. Kind of a ghost wine. Empty, lacking body, fruit, tannins, acids, color, substance. NR



A sudden thunderstorm kept us trapped for a bit, but good excuse to revisit wines. Fun night, fun group (all 7 who showed up)



Grade disclaimer: I'm a very easy grader, basically A is an excellent wine, B a good wine, C mediocre. Anything below C means I wouldn't drink at a party where it was only choice. Furthermore, I offer no promises of objectivity, accuracy, and certainly not of consistency. 


Dale,

pretty nice line-up. Not having much experience with Montrose, I think I only had a 1995 that I purchased during a trip to Bordeaux. Drank it with friends and liked it, but I did not thing it was that special, and actually not up to its price (was purchased at about 60-75 euros in a shop in Saint Emilion -not the cheapest place to buy wine-) in 2006 or so.

What intrigues me more is that you started a Bordeaux dinnner with a Spätlese. For me it is very difficult to taste and enjoy dry wine (white or red) after fruity Riesling. Every wine tastes sour and tannic (if red) to me.

s

DaleW wrote in news:10e31472-e221-4fa5-986d- snipped-for-privacy@b15g2000yqd.googlegroups.com:

I had the '90 Montrose 11 years ago and it was HUGE. It is the biggest wine I have ever had. It obviously still needs more time. I had the '70 on the same night. My TNs are long gone and I only remember it being very good.

Fred.

Well, first of all it wasn't a Riesling. :) But your point still holds for Scheurebe I guess. I think having a red wine wine immediately after an off dry wine would have that effect. But this was our "while you wait" wine, and we had plenty of time and water before we started first flight (especially since we were waiting a long time for the last person, who never showed, I'll post a separate post re the 03 to clarify). Didn't bother me. With a little water, bread, and time, I have no issues with even a dessert wine with foie gras as an early course.

IMPORTANT EDIT I was trying to be funny. The person with the 03 never showed up. I was posting this on another forum where he participates, and should have been clearer

Thanks for the great notes. Montrose is a personal favorite of mine. The '82 is a "go to" wine for me. The '90 is also a real favorite but I agree about the barnyard aspect of it. I haven't opened one in a while so I need to try one to see if I get the samne results.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required