TN: SOBER tasting- Bdx, Rhone, Piedmont

Oct 26, 2006 3 Replies

Mark Golodetz hosted last night's meeting of SOBER (Several Oenophiles Becoming Extremely Rambunctious) and put on a superb night of food and wine. A great lineup:


1988 Lanson "Noble Cuvee" Champagne Fresh baked bread, apple pie. Good acidity, good length. I don't tend to drink much aged Champagne, but liked this a lot in a very brief taste. B+

Mark had a nice assortment of paté, meats, and cheeses out. The first flight was blind: Wine #1 : Ripe, meaty nose. Some stones and smoke on palate. Sweet pure dark berry fruit, good acidic balance, resolved tannins. John pretty quickly says Northern Rhone, chooses Hermitage over Côte-Rôtie, and he's right, the 1983 Delas Freres "Marquise de la Tourette" Hermitage A-



Wine #2: Very ripe, kirschy, full, a little hint of barnyard. Seems shorter and drier on finish than other two. Some olives and mushrooms with time. With the hint of knowing wine #1 a couple people quickly identify the 1983 Jabloulet "La Chapelle" Hermitage. B



Wine #3. Somewhat lifted nose. Rather deep fruit, a meaty note like #1, fully mature. It's the 1983 Chave Hermitage. John says this bottle is a bit advanced, but I like, although a tad less than #1. B+/A-



Next flight was served with a delicious lamb stew (with a hint of lemon) and pureed parsnips. Not blind.


1996 Pape-Clement (Pessac-Leognan) Earthy, mineral, with redcurrant fruit. Some tobacco and pencil shavings with time. My favorite for drinking today, though it certainly has plenty of life ahead of it. A-


1996 Pontet-Canet (Pauillac) Ripest and most modern of the bunch (our leading oneo-Ludditte John has a good time riffing on its faults), but I like (as I have in the past). Cassis and sweet oak, nice texture, nice finish. Outclassed a bit, but a nice wine for me. B+


1996 Leoville-Barton (St. Julien) I find this beautiful, rich and structured with deep deep dark fruit and long finish. Not as ready as the Pape-Clement, A-

Mark brought out another blind wine. He asked me what I thought, I found it rather oaky/modern, pretty sure it was Cabernet/Merlot. Guesses around the table included young Spanish. Oops, the 1996 Haut-Brion (Pessac-Leognan). Not exactly posterchild for modern in Bdx, but you can't take your guess back. After a bit it opens somewhat, but to me it's still rather oaky and monolithic. Powerful wine. I'm sure that the oak will integrate, but B+ for now.



Next flight (not blind) was accompanied by the cheeses (nice assortment especially a Tallegio).


1996 Sandrone "Cannubi Boschis" Barolo High acidity, good red fruit, a bit of cedar but dominated by flowers and a little tar. Not as tannic as many 1996 Barolos, but does need some time. I liked a lot. A-/B+


1997 Sandrone "Cannubi Boschis" Barolo Not surprisingly the ripest of three. Low acid, soft, ripe round fruit. Doesn't seem as deep as the '96, but would be ok as a restaurant wine. B/B+


1998 Sandrone "Cannubi Boschis" Barolo Quite thin compared to the other two, wood sticks out more. Maybe a little green. Mark felt it was much better with the cheese than alone. I think better with food, but still my least favorite wine of night. But if I got in a restaurant I'd shrug and make do. B-

Another blind wine, this time I refrained from guessing as I overheard Mark say what it was. But I don't think I would have been close. The



1971 Haut-Brion was so fresh and young I would have never have guessed its age. Pure clean fruit, earth and ferric minerals, beautiful and my WOTN. A

We finished with the 1965 Delaforce Colheita. Very caramelly, with a little marmalade and mocha. Sweet, clean, easy. B+



Nice night with a nice group and a generous host.



Grade disclaimer: I'm a very easy grader, basically A is an excellent wine, B a good wine, C mediocre. Anything below C means I wouldn't drink at a party where it was only choice. Furthermore, I offer no promises of objectivity, accuracy, and certainly not of consistency.



vintages of Pape-Clement, this wine has greatly improved from what it was in the 1970s. My notes from that era were not very flattering. They also had a white in the 70s that was decent, but not outstanding, in the one vintage that I tasted. If I were buying Bordeaux today, it might be worth checking Pape-Clement again. In the 70s I soon concluded that money spent for Pape-Clement would buy a wine much more to my taste elsewhere.

OT Note:

I just downloaded the very new Firefox 2.0 browser, which is a major upgrade in many ways. Now many words that I write or read in this group have a red underline. I found out that the red underline is for words for which Firefox questions the English spelling. In my response, Pape is red underlined since the spelling checker does not understand the French, at least on the English version of the browser. The same applies for Pessac-Leognan on your post. Alt.food.wine now has become rather colorful with red underlines, because so many non-English words are used.

I liked the '61, but think Pape-Clement's rep wasn't too shiny in most of 70s & 80s. I missed a vertical my group did of most major PCs from

1955 to 2000, but recall most of my friends were unimpressed with most of the maybe mid60s through mid80s wines in context of vintages. But late 80s they seem to have turned around, and I've really enjoyed the '90 twice. The '96 as noted is nice (this is several times for me), as is the '98. Lately there has been a switch in style, and the 2001 & 2002 are definitely somewhat (insert your favorite descriptor here for modern style: international, spoofulated, Parkerized, hedonistic, sexybeastified, whatever). That should bring some red out for you. :)

The improvement - stunning and fast - dates from vintage 1986 upwords. Pape Clément was acquired in 1937 by Paul Montagne. 1939 saw the entire property more or less fully destructed by a severe hailstorm. Paul's son Léo took over, but apparently never really cared. Léo's son-in-law Bernard Magrez was put in charge sometime in the mid-1980ies.

So you can buy "blind" almost anything from 1986 or younger, as you should avoid just about anything from 1985 or older.

I have been on a press trip to Pape Clément in October 1989. Denis Dubourdieu, then consultant oenologist, let us taste 1986/7/8 sinde by side, plus a tank sample of one of the merlots from 1989. The wines were quite impressive, with 1987 a much lighter style, of course.

Funnily, the tasting in the chai was done from Riedel glasses, while the wines for lunch at the chateau - all from the pre-Magrez era - were served in crappy glasses the caterer had brought with him. (To be honsest, Bordeaux caterers today do care for better stemware, but at that time ...).

But I remember that everyone had standing, besides the small glasses for the wines, a water bowl that happened to be the large Riedel Sommelier Bordeaux Grand Cru stem (4400/00). With the last red, Pape Clément 1961, I had it poured into this glass, much to the distress of the server - and to an almost collapsing maitre d' in the background.

We were four tables. From every table one non-French journalist was asked about his opinion about the '61. As fate would have it, from my table they asked me. Since the wine was rather tired and slightly oxidized - nowhere, where a decent 1961 claret should be

- I tried to be polite and deliberated about how really great reds converge when getting older, so that the characters of an almost

30 year old claret and an equally old Barolo show similarities.

I guess what I said was not what they wanted to hear ... ;-(

M.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required