wines, no need to breath.

agree with ms macquinty about breathing. just think about the small volume of air in contact with the wine thru the neck of the bottle. decanting is another thing......young wine will react with air on decanting with a short burst of of polymerisation and esterification in the decanter for around 3-4 hours, enhancing the bouquet and flavor. older wine may or may not improve on decanting. if it smells sweet in the bottle, leaver it alone. if it's musty or has thrown a crust, decant but drink within 2 hours. very old wine should not be decanted unless it has thrown a crust. and then it should be drunk immediately or if musty (bottle stink) left for 10-15 minutes. N

Reply to
Neil R.
Loading thread data ...

Actually, she seems to be interchangably using terms of breathing/decanting, claiming that any exposure to air does harm. Which, as Ian says, is rubbish IMHO. I'll say that at the Bordeaux offlines where I regularly participate, it is considered the norm to double-decant (pour into a decanter, let a little air expose, then return to bottle -if older wines rinsing sediment from bottle) in advance. On occasion someone doesn't have opportunity to do so, and almost invariably wine doesn't show well against its peers. Even the double-decanted bottles often have wines show further improvement in the glass, as they get more air.

As to breathing in the bottle, it's true that little is done by just opening bottle. However, my norm at home if a bottle needs a little air but not neccessarily decanting -and if I don't feel like washing the decanter :) - is to open, pour out one glass, occasionally smelling and taking small sips to watch evolution. Meanwhile exposed surface area is much larger.

And while we might normally talk of reds and breathing, few wines seem to appreciate some air as much as youthful good white Burgundies! Dale

Dale Williams Drop "damnspam" to reply

Reply to
Dale Williams

To clarify, I meant the exposed area in the bottle is larger once the wine is down to low shoulder. Dale

Dale Williams Drop "damnspam" to reply

Reply to
Dale Williams

BLT? Your were drinking good wine with bacon,lettuce and tomato sannies?? Forsooth!

My preference is to err on the side of caution and open the wine a very conservative amount of time ahead of projected drinking time. You can always wait while it opens in the glass, but if you miss it by allowing it to die alone, you commit a sin against the wine!

Reply to
Bill Spohn
[] ] My preference is to err on the side of caution and open the wine a very ] conservative amount of time ahead of projected drinking time. You can always ] wait while it opens in the glass, but if you miss it by allowing it to die ] alone, you commit a sin against the wine!

Yes, I agree with this where old claret is concerned. Contrary to Mike's assertion, I have seen wine die in the glass after a while, or so it seemed anyway. Certainly no general rule, but as Bill says, error on the side of caution is not such a bad idea with a rare bottle.

I agree generally that the idea that aeration does not improve a certain set of wines is rubbish. It can also give you an idea (rough) of how a young wine will age, or whether it's built to age at all.

Keeping in mind that as in all matters of the senses, tasting is subjective, and I'm certainly willing to accord Ms. what's-her-name her opinion. But to stateit as a general rule in a populist debunking operation is absurd.

-E

Reply to
Emery Davis

Salut/Hi Bill Spohn,

le/on 27 Jan 2004 19:40:03 GMT, tu disais/you said:-

I trust this is a gentle leg pull!

In general, yes, but only if _you're_ in charge of the timing and the flow of the meal and the food and your guests are (yes, I know, you only invite suitably educated guests for wines that good) prepared to be flexible in timing. My problem is that I want both food AND wine to be perfect at the same time, and with a roast, for example, you can't expect it to wait for an hour while the '66 Montrose finally wakes up!

It's a genuine problem, Bill, I know. I agree that it would be a crime to be drinking your white burgundy with a fish course, while the red wine quietly dies in the decanter.

Reply to
Ian Hoare

Bien sur, mon ami!

very>>conservative amount of time ahead of projected drinking time. You can always>>wait while it opens in the glass, but if you miss it by allowing it to die>>alone, you commit a sin against the wine!

the meal and the food and your guests are (yes, I know, you only invite>suitably educated guests for wines that good) prepared to be flexible in>timing. My problem is that I want both food AND wine to be perfect at the>same time, and with a roast, for example, you can't expect it to wait for an>hour while the '66 Montrose finally wakes up!

Yep - comes down to priorities some times - I've even shifted a wine that refused to open up from main course to later, and had a pause when one opened too soon, and we just enjoyed that wine with no food (or at least my guests did

- I was mostly still cooking the main course).

Sometimes feel like a juggler - and wish I'd opted for younger wines where this sort of thing isn't much of an issue - except for the ones you have to open a day ahead....

Reply to
Bill Spohn

Ian

You don't believe that pouring wine out of a bottle over the course of a couple of hours causes the wine to oxidize (develop)?

I beg to differ on this one. As Dale points out, a partially emptied bottle has a large surface area exposed to oxygenated air (20%). Repeated pouring introduces more of this wine to air over the course of the evening. My experience is that latter glasses served out of an undecanted bottle seem more developed, especially if considerable time elapses. This is certainly the case when I served the 88 Duhart Milon last week.

Tom Schellberg

Reply to
Xyzsch

Salut/Hi Xyzsch,

le/on 05 Feb 2004 00:45:19 GMT, tu disais/you said:-

When I was replying to this post, it was in the context (in my mind) of a) taking the cork out and leaving the wine "as is". or b) decanting/carafing

As I said to Dale in an earlier thread Message-ID:

I accept that pouring a glass or more out of a bottle WILL allow aeration, and that as a compromise solution in the absence of decanting it's acceptable.

Indeed. However, I do feel that this does not give as good results as decanting, where ALL the wine gets exposed once and then can develop. It certainly countas as letting the wine breathe.

Reply to
Ian Hoare

Open a bottle a day for 3 days or so. Drink a glass or two when first opened to allow room for air. Vaccuvan the 3. Open a fourth, and blind taste all.

Big Cab or Shiraz or mix fresh from OZ does best after a couple days under vaccuvan to my mind.

Reply to
gerald

Salut/Hi gerald,

le/on Thu, 05 Feb 2004 17:59:27 -0500, tu disais/you said:-

Thank you for your suggestion. But

a) I know what the effects of air on wine are. b) I've no intention of opening 4 bottles to satisfy someone _else's_ curiosity. c) I don't have access to the sort of wine you describe. d) I have no problems over decanting a bottle of wine.

Reply to
Ian Hoare

Thanks for clarifying Ian.

Tom Schellberg

Reply to
Xyzsch

DrinksForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.