Re: Dry vs. liquid yeasts

Aug 03, 2003 1 Replies

Tim-Your beer making friends are indeed correct. And, the best wine I ever made was



1999 Vidal fermented with Wyeast Chablis liquid culture. However, I believe that wine was excellent because of the grape quality that year. I've tried the same yeast again and the wine was not up to the 1999 version. I think liquid yeast cultures are more important in beer making since the product is finished and consumed in a matter of months instead of years like most of our wines. So, I always use liquid culture for beer and now days I use the interesting dry yeasts for wines.

Bill Frazier Olathe, Kansas



difference in the quality of their beer. what is the pros and cons of
>dry vs liquid in wines?

I'm more generally a brewer than a winemaker. I went through the "liquid yeast fetish" period that most brewers go through (and some never recover from) and learned this:

There is no "quality" difference between liquid and dry yeast (although there is a fair price difference... ;-). Both offer high viability uncontaminated yeast strains.

The only advantage to liquid cultures, and it's a big one, is that a far greater variety of yeast can be provided this way. But if you have a dry strain that you are happy with, then it's very unlikely that the same, or very similar, strain provided in liquid form will give you any better results.

I use liquid strains only when I'm looking for unique flavor chracteristics in a yeast that cannot be found in a dry strain. Otherwise I use dry yeast, which lasts longer and can be pitched without first preparing a starter culture. Most liquid yeasts, even those that claim otherwise, really need to be stepped up in a starter culture before pitching to give good results.

I've probably trod on someone's religious beliefs here, let's see...

--arne

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required