Re: Dry vs. liquid yeasts

Tim-Your beer making friends are indeed correct. And, the best wine I ever made was

1999 Vidal fermented with Wyeast Chablis liquid culture. However, I believe that wine was excellent because of the grape quality that year. I've tried the same yeast again and the wine was not up to the 1999 version. I think liquid yeast cultures are more important in beer making since the product is finished and consumed in a matter of months instead of years like most of our wines. So, I always use liquid culture for beer and now days I use the interesting dry yeasts for wines.

Bill Frazier Olathe, Kansas

difference in the quality of their beer. what is the pros and cons of >dry vs liquid in wines?
Reply to
Bill Frazier
Loading thread data ...

I'm more generally a brewer than a winemaker. I went through the "liquid yeast fetish" period that most brewers go through (and some never recover from) and learned this:

There is no "quality" difference between liquid and dry yeast (although there is a fair price difference... ;-). Both offer high viability uncontaminated yeast strains.

The only advantage to liquid cultures, and it's a big one, is that a far greater variety of yeast can be provided this way. But if you have a dry strain that you are happy with, then it's very unlikely that the same, or very similar, strain provided in liquid form will give you any better results.

I use liquid strains only when I'm looking for unique flavor chracteristics in a yeast that cannot be found in a dry strain. Otherwise I use dry yeast, which lasts longer and can be pitched without first preparing a starter culture. Most liquid yeasts, even those that claim otherwise, really need to be stepped up in a starter culture before pitching to give good results.

I've probably trod on someone's religious beliefs here, let's see...

--arne

Reply to
Arne Thormodsen

DrinksForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.