Re: one more must analysis question

Lee, You are not far off from my numbers on Central Valley juice from Regina. I did a little experiment this morning on pH that you might find interesting.

I have a blend of 12 gallons of Cab Sauv juice, 6 of Cab Franc juice and 5 gallons of Cab Sauv grapes, pressed after about 5 days of fermentation on the skins.

The SG is 0.996, it is still 'gassy'.

I checked the pH without removing the CO2, it was 3.65. After a few second boil, it dropped to 3.55. Not a huge change, but significant to me.

3 other blends of different juices did about the same thing, all read a little different but the change was about -0.10 pH units.

Here is the initial and final pH and TA of a white (Riesling)from the Central Valley this year.

Initial Current (3 weeks) pH 3.17 3.10

T.A. 5.3 (corrected to 5.8 preferment), now 7.7.

Other reds did about the same. All went up at least 1 g/l. All taste a little tart and will go through a cold stabilization which should drop out some tartaric, so I'm pretty much not concerned here.

In other words, I'm not sure you have to add any acid, my Riesling TA went up almost 2 g/l. If I added anything, it would be tartaric if it were mine, it can be dropped out with cold stabilization.

Hope that helps. Regards, Joe

The grapes that I can get here on the east coast are usually overripe Central > Valley California grapes. Invariably, they have low acid levels. But I just > tested a sauvignon blanc batch that had pH levels in the 3.2-3.3 range (tested > with 2 different recently calibrated meters) and TA levels in the .50 range. I > tested the TA's on freshly pressed juice, using a titration method with a color > indicator. I even verified the titration using the pH meter and waiting for a > pH of 8.2 as the titration progressed, and the TA of .50 is valid. I guess my > NaOH standard could be off, but I doubt it. > > So this is the question: How can there be that much discrepancy between TA and > pH? I can't see adding tartaric acid to a must that has a pH of 3.2. > > What would you do? > > Lee
Reply to
Joe Sallustio
Loading thread data ...
.

That would be significant to me Joe.

Wouldn't you expect the pH to go up after removing carbonic acid?

clyde

Reply to
Clyde Gill

I'd leave it as is and ferment it. Trust the pH. Ignore the TA. Sounds like the grapes are low in potassium.

Tom S

Reply to
Tom S

Clyde, I thought that was what it should do too, but that's why I measured it. I made fresh buffers last night and am going to do it again on a larger sample of wines; I have 8 going now.

It's a potential measurement from the probe to solution; maybe the CO2 gas that forms on the pH electrode confuses it, I don't know.

I'm an electronics guy, not a chemist though. Maybe someone else can chime in that understands this better.

Regards, Joe

Reply to
Joe Sallustio

DrinksForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.