Sale puts Latrobe Brewing jobs up in air

Sale puts Latrobe Brewing jobs up in air

Friday, May 19, 2006 By Len Boselovic, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

The fate of 250 jobs at historic Latrobe Brewing plant is up in the air today after its Belgian owner announced plans to put it on the market and sell the Rolling Rock brands to Anheuser-Busch for $82 million.

St. Louis-based Anheuser-Busch will begin brewing Rolling Rock and Rock Green Light in August at its Newark, N.J. brewery.

"We don't like to see Rolling rock leaving Latrobe. Rolling rock is associated with Latrobe much like Iron City is associated with Pittsburgh," said George Sharkey, a business agent for one of two union locals at the Latrobe plant.

He said Latrobe employs about 180 union workers and 70 nonunion workers. The plant produced about 850,000 barrels annually. It has a capacity of 1.3 million barrels.

Union workers at the plant ratified a six-year contract last summer.

Selling the Rolling Rock brands is based on InBev's strategy of focussing on "the high-growth import brands in our portfolio," said Doug Corbett, president of InBev USA. Those brands include Stella Artois, Bass Pale Ale, Beck's, Brahma and Labatt Blue.

The sale comes after Gov. Ed Rendell and other elected officials had offered government assistance in an effort to save jobs at the brewery. Government officials had become involved because they expected Anheuser-Busch would brew Rolling Rock at its other facilities.

Mr. Sharkey said union officials have been told there are buyers interested in purchasing the plant without the Rolling rock brands. But with the industry burdened with excess brewing capacity, prospective buyers may be leery about purchasing a plant as large as Latrobe without a major brand.

"Certainly that wouldn't be easy," Mr. Sharkey said. Having a major brand "would be nice, but there's contract beers and other avenues to pursue."

Latrobe Brewing's uncertain futures comes as Pittsburgh Brewing, the brewer of Iron City, languishes in Chapter 11 bankruptcy. The company began formal negotiations with its union this week as part of its efforts to reorganize.

Latrobe Brewing introduced the Rolling Rock brand in 1939. The company was acquired in 1987 by Labatt, which was later acquired by Belgian brewer Interbrew. InBev was formed when Interbrew merged with Brazilian brewer AmBev in 2004.

Reply to
tomkanpa
Loading thread data ...

You know, for many years some people used to lament the disappearance of the small, local and regional brewers with the expression that the "big brewers were gobbling up the little breweries" but, in retrospect, the big brewers who tried that technique were the ones that failed (Falstaff, Heileman, Stroh, Associated, General, Pabst) and the ones which succeeded to become the current the BIG 3 (A-B, Miller, Coors) did it by marketing their own brands and building brand new, efficent breweries.

Sure, there are some excepts to this blanket statement- Miller aquired Lite and Meister Brau, Coors took over the Schlitz Memphis plant, A-B picked up a Schlitz brewery in NY, etc. and both Miller and A-B tried "alliances" with micros in recent years.

This is the first domestic brand that A-B has taken over that I can recall in many years (they once had a beer in the South called "Regal" that was originally an brand of the American Brewery in New Orleans).

Trivia note-It's not the first time Rolling Rock will be brewed somewhere other than Latrobe, however- during a strike in the 1970's, Schmidt's of Phila. "contract brewed" RR (some would say the Philly union scabbed on their Western PA. brothers, but I don't want to get political ).

Hopefully, someone will pick up that brewery (and make a better beer that Rolling Rock) but it does seem unlikely given the current state of the industry (VERY BIG brewers and small micros with the "medium" sized brewers still disappearing).

Reply to
jesskidden

The article I read at cnn.com implied that InBev is in separate talks to sell the brewery, which implies that someone different may brew beer there. Or they might sell it for another use. There is a water bottling operation in Latrobe, so maybe they might be interested in the bottling line. I know they have expanded a couple of times. What other brewer might be interested? Would Sam Adams want their own brewery? Or is there a micro that is growing? To me the only thing that is different between Bud and Rolling Rock is the green bottle, although it is always nice to drink a local brand.

Tom

Reply to
Tom or Mary

"Sam Adams" - actually, Boston Beer Co., which is the company that makes Sam Adams - already has "their own brewery," the former Hudepohl- Schoenling facility, in Cincinnati. Looks like somebody else will have to bid for the Latrobe plant.

Reply to
dgs

Apparently, there HAS been some talk about Boston Beer Company buying the Latrobe brewery in local papers, and the statement from BBC doesn't exactly rule it out (altho' I don't really know how to translate "corporate speak").

"If Latrobe Brewing is sold, one possible buyer could be the Boston Beer Co. Inc., brewer of Samuel Adams beers.

"We're always evaluating business options, but I can't comment on specific breweries," said Michelle Sullivan, spokeswoman for Boston Beer, based in Boston.

Sullivan said the company last year invested more than $11 million in the Cincinnati Brewery to expand the facility and increase efficiency."

formatting link

========= I don't drink much SA beer, so haven't checked the labels lately- do they still have a lot of their beer contract-brewed or is everything coming out of Cinci & Boston these days? One would think if they WERE to buy another brewery, it wouldn't be so close to their current facilities and would be on the West Coast.

Reply to
jesskidden

Buying the brewery in Latrobe has a big advantage: it's a big employer in a small town and the town and/or county could put together a package of tax incentives to lure a buyer. I don't know how much Pittsburgh Brewing is locked into their brewery, but they are in Chapter 11, and dropping their expensive Pittsburgh obligations (by laying off their employees) and shifting production to Latrobe might make economic sense for them.

Tom W

Reply to
Tom Wolper

Yes.

Pittsburgh Brewing Co has been limping along for years now and they have no clear plan to emerge from bankruptcy. They are truly one setback away from closing their doors. Here's a chance to move into a refurbished facility with lots of tax breaks and be only 45 minutes from their primary market. Pittsburgh has an older demographic (esp. away from the universities) and Iron City is the choice of older drinkers. In 5 or 10 years as the older generation passes, Iron City will lose its market. I don't know how they're planning for this, except for passing their pension obligations to the government, but if they can lower their supply-side costs by moving to Latrobe, they'd be fools not to.

Tom W

Reply to
Tom Wolper

DrinksForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.