1996 Opus One 2003 Gaja San Lorenzo

Met friends for dinner and in keeping with my inventory reduction I brought two wines from my orphan bin.

1996 Opus One-I was never a fan of the over priced wine but I did buy it fo r a few years more out of curiosity. The wine was in perfect shape. Dark purple no signs of bricking or aging. Nose shows a bit of maturity with a firm cedar note over cassis and blackberry and a whiff of barnyard. A bit Bordeaux-like on the palate with a fair amount of woody cedary flavors. Pl enty of black fruits and a slight mineral note on the finish. Fairly resol ved tannins with a bit of dryness at the end. Not as bad as i thought. B+

2003 Gaja Sori San Lorenzo-Very dark reddish purple in the glass. I always find San Lorenzo to be the darkest and most fruit forward of Gaja's wines. Effusive nose of smoke and tar with black fruits and black coffee. Smoot h on the palate, plummy and ripe (2003 was a fairly ripe vintage) Black che rry, cassis, coffee, anise in a fairly powerful package. I was with some I talian winemakers from Alto Adige and they swooned over the Gaja.

Reply to
Bi!!
Loading thread data ...

Hah! I've also found Opus overpriced and overhyped for what it was, but recently I've read some notes on the older vintages of Opus from the '80s that suggest that they do in fact turn into something attractive with enough time in the bottle. I still think that they're overpriced, though :)

Mark Lipton

Reply to
Mark Lipton

In the book "The Rise and Fall of the House of Mondavi", Robert Mondavi rec ounts how he and Baron Rothschild priced the initial vintage of Opus One ba sically by doubling the price of the highest wine for sale in Napa. By doi ng so they created and entirely new pricing structure for Napa wines over $

50/bottle. CUrrent vintages seem to be in the $250/bottle range. LOL.
Reply to
Bi!!

DrinksForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.