No problem.
I do have to say, not allowing nutritional information on beer labels is one of the more asinine regs I've seen. What possible harm is there in letting people know how many calories, carbs, etc. are present? I can understand not allowing brewers to make any sorts of health claims, but simple nutritional facts are not claims of health benefits in any fashion.
-Steve
(SNIP)
Does anyone know if this beer is available outside USA - especially if it is here in Australia????
I'll trade some dogfish for some Little Creatures. I am back in the states after 5 short years in the lucky country. My wife would love some LC pale ale. I can get any Dogfish beer as the brewerey is minutes from our beach house. Cheers, Jack
nutritional
snipped-for-privacy@yahoo.com.au (The Alternative Guy) wrote on 20 Nov
2003:
Sorry, internationally the WW Stout makes it to England (as a 21% beer), but nowhere else. Maybe Canada, but that doesn't help you either. Dogfish Head just doesn't make enough beer to expand to a place like Australia and expect to recoup.
Witzel
So, what's with "REPEAL" in the title of many of the beers on the partial list? F'r'instance-
11.79 9.54And, if you guess it's got something to do with what the beer was after Prohibition, this one'll disprove that-
Blue Moon Honey Blond Repeal
Also, from the site, this is incorrect-
"...Bert Grant, better known by some as the man who opened the Yakima Brewing Company, the first microbrewery in the U.S.,..."
There were a number of micro's that came before Yakima. I think Grant's sometimes credited with the first "brewpub", tho'...
It's Coors way of differentiating between 3.2 % for some western states and their regular-strength beers. Their designation, not mine.
Bob
11.79 9.5411.79 9.54
Jack...I'll see what can be done...they are in Fremantle, about 38 hours drive from me, in Melbourne, lol
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required