I respect that you don't want to approach tea this way and that you perceive it as "cold" and "technical", but I'm not trying to convince you to do it my way. And I'm not denigrating your way, like you are mine. I could call your way "fuzzy" or "illogical" or even "mindless" or worse, but I'm not. If it works for you, great. It's not my way, but that's what makes the world go 'round.
I'm just asking some questions of people with more experience and then factoring that into my way. If you have some experience to offer, I'd love to hear it. If my way is so distressing for you that you cannot tolerate reading it, don't. Put me in your killfile, if you need to. But it is not helpful to me for you to call me names or invalidate my way.
Using that standard, there is really nothing outside of pure mathematics that we can "measure". Of course it's subjective. But, unless you are saying that I cannot tell what I like, then I submit that I am the perfect measuring device for tea taste. See, I am not trying to determine what you will like or what anyone other than myself will like. I am pretty sure that I am capable of giving a pot of tea a 0-10 rating that will be reasonably valid.
How do you know what "should" dominate *my* tea experience?
And you get to define what the "right" frame of mind is?
I'll accept that this is true for you, but I cannot understand why it is so important to you that this is also true for me. It's not, by the way.
There you go again with the judgments and the denigrations.
Hoew much is "too much" for me?
I am not offended, but telling me what you want me to hear, instead of what I asked for, is not that helpful -- especially when it is loaded with put-downs.
I take it that "stumbling" is much preferred over "hacking". ;-)