$13 Garnacha Vinas Viejas 2001 (RP 93) - Has someone here actually tasted this wine?

I just came across a bottle of this wine (the last one they pretended to have) at a local shop. I had never heard of it before, but they had a copy with RP's notes beneath the shelf, claiming that he rated it a whopping 93:

>>>>>>>>>>>>

Put your seat belts on because the 2001 Garnacha Vinas Viejas (an old vine

100% Grenache cuvee), is prodigious! There are 10,000 cases of this offering (15% alcohol) from the estate's oldest, highest altitude vineyard (100-year old vines planted at 900 meters in 100% slate). It is aged 10% in new French oak and 90% in old barrels and demi-muids. My tasting notes simply read, "no one will believe how great this wine is." It is similar in style to the 2002, but more complex and richer, with greater texture, and a finish that goes on for 40 seconds. The opaque purple color is followed by a phenomenally rich wine that is pure kirsch mixed with blackberries and minerals. Will we ever see another wine this extraordinary for this price? One cannot bestow enough kudos on importer Eric Solomon for unearthing these treasures. The 2001 old vine Garnacha will age well for a decade, although it will undoubtedly be at its finest during its first 5-6 years of life. P. S. I asked a wine loving friend to taste this on the third day it had been opened. He went ga-ga, and said "what does this cost - $50?"
Reply to
Arne Ahronovich
Loading thread data ...

Mr Parker was in an exceedingly expansive mood that day. It is the normal rough-finished well-flavored highly extracted Spanish wine that he on occasion will single out and Beatify. It is worth its price. Only.

pavane

Reply to
pavane

Lol Pavane, that comment reinforces my view of Parker, one of the worse wine reviewers about.

Ron Lel

Reply to
Ron Lel

Why worst? Virtually everyone who's tasted with him agrees that he is a phenomenally talented taster, and he is moreover quite consistent. I for one find his reviews of B'dx and the S. Rhone quite reliable, once one understands his preferences. The only three areas in which he merits criticism (IMO) are his undue influence on the market (arguably not his fault but rather that of the sheeple who takes his notes as gospel), his love of over-extracted reds with heavy doses of new oak and his introduction of a pseudo-scientific 100 point rating system.

All of that pales in comparison to the incompetence of the wine reviews that appear in many newspapers, in most competitions and in the Wine Speculator. I would much rather read the notes of a consistent taster whose tastes differ from my own (i.e., RP) than someone whose notes are arbitrary and inconsistent.

Mark Lipton

Reply to
Mark Lipton

Salut/Hi Mark Lipton,

le/on Thu, 27 May 2004 11:33:52 -0500, tu disais/you said:-

Yes I wondered at that.

on the market (arguably

Though he doesn't do much to minimise it.

A perfectly legitimate matter of personal taste, IMO.

Agreed.

Couldn't agree with you more.

That said, I think his influence on the world of wine in general has been catastrophic.

Reply to
Ian Hoare

Why one of the worst? Inconsistent reviews of Bordeaux, for example commenting on wines still suffering from bottle shock and then re reviewing them some months later with glowing reviews, emphasis on "turbo St Emilions", emphasis on extractive over oaked jammy wines which I dislike intensly. I would much rather read Coates or Robinson.

Ron Lel

Reply to
Ron Lel

DrinksForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.