German Riesling 2003

I thought I would share my thoughts/overall impression of the overall German Riesling vintage for 2003. I don't know if anyone else has tasted many 2003's; I'd be interested to compare notes. A number of producers were in Toronto as part of a rolling tour of the

2003 vintage and overall the wines were quite impressive. To me, it seems a more successful Kab/Spat/Auslese vintage than BA/TBA. I found some of the BA's and most of the TBA's to be somewhat cloying. There didn't seem quite enough acidity to balance the huge sugar. Very little Botrytis. I found many of the Kab's/Spatlese to be quite excellent, if still very closed and really not developed being so young. (I haver very little experience tasting such young Rieslings) Overall, I think the vintage will provide extremely delicious wines to drink over the near to mid term depending on producers, but don't seem to have the acid and structure to really last as long as other vintages. Prices upon release should be resonable though. I don't have the tasting booklet with me at work but there were about 20 producers. My favourites included Gunderloch (always outstanding and their Nackenheim Rothenberg BA and TBA is amazing), Johannishof (excellent wines from Kab to BA. Their TBA still had too much sulphur to really judge) Hans Lang had some 2001s which were beginning to show that beautiful Riesling petrol note and their 2003's were solid as well. Richter's was very fine, balanced wines. Schloss Schonborn were good too. St. Urbans-Hof was an odd one; I'm not familiar with their style but I got so much of an earthy, profile, with so little fruit, (even from the 2002 they offered) that I didn't know what to make of it. The winemaker said they use indigenous yeasts which may have something to do with but I don't know. Studert Prum, not the famous JJ, but good stuff nonetheless Dr. Pauly Bergweiler, top notch. beautiful, feminine, well-crafted.

Peter

Reply to
Peter Muto
Loading thread data ...

Simply put, it is curious to me how the same people that are toting the Kabinetts and Spatleses as lacking acidity are also saying that the BA's and TBA's are the real winners. If the vintage as a whole lacks acidity wouldn't that apply to all levels of ripeness? One would think that lower sugar levels (ie Kabinett) equals more acidity, and higher sugar levels equal lower acidity; thus confusing the novice like myself. Can anyone explain why the lesser QMP's would show lower acidiy levels and therefore be out of balance than the much riper (and presumably sweeter) Spatleses, Ausleses, BA's and TBA's?

Reply to
Jaybert41

Probably because different is also the expectation of acidity in a particular kind of wine? I'm guessing, maybe someon can correct.

Vilco

Reply to
Vilco

Jay, I've wondered this myself. It seems a contradiction, as acidities (to my mind) tend to be vintage distinctive, and a ripe year would preclude having decent acidities. Perhaps as the response to your Donnhoff question got translated, we need to 'consume (the 2003's) by the caseload' to determine for ourselves ;)

Mark S

Reply to
Markus

One theory that could explain this is:

During times of high heat or extreme lack of water, the vine can start to shut down and sugar production comes to a halt. Therefore no sugar is being sent to the grapes, but the malate present in the grape itsef is still respired, reducing it's content. So now the grapes could have fairly low sugar content and low malic acid content and these end up going into the Kabinetts and Spatlese.

The vines that did not suffer from the high heat and lack of water continue to produce sugar at a high rate due to the above average amount of sun light and are picked when the acid levels are right, but with a much higher Brix. They may actually be picked before the Kabinett/Spatlese grapes. These go into the Auslese.

Some of these Auslese grapes are left on the vine and dehydration starts, concentrating both the acids and the sugar. Even though some of the malate is still being consumed in the grapes, the dehydration of the grapes can keep the acid to water ratio the same while sugar to water ratio increases. These go into the BA and TBAs.

Or the winemaker could have just added acid.

Andy

Reply to
JEP

In fact, Johannes Hasselbach (son of winemaker Fritz Hasselbach of Gunderloch) said exactly that. The extreme heat shrivled the berries thereby increasing the concentration of acidity which helped a great deal.

The key thing is balance; I found in tasting that most of the Kab's and Spatlese's still managed a good balance between sugar and acidity. I did not find that the case as much the sweeter the wine got. Plus, the BA/TBA's had very little botrytis which to me, really just makes the wine very sweet and concentrated (and not as complex)

Peter

Reply to
Peter Muto

I managed to taste a lot of the '03s in tank and was not unduly worried about lack of acidity. I remember I was most impressed with the Loosen wines. Interestingly the Mosels displayed more acidity than the Rheingaus. I would not be worried about the keeping qualities of either region.

Ron Lel

Reply to
Ron Lel

DrinksForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.