News - France Plans To Boost Wine Exports

21/12/2005 Paul Carrel The French government has vowed to help winemakers boost exports to claw back business lost to "New World" producers and offset waning domestic demand.

Falling consumption among a more health-conscious population and increased competition from the New World rivals such as Australia and Chile have hit French winemakers hard and prompted them to stage street protests in recent weeks.

"We are going to prepare a national strategy to reconquer our market share," Agriculture Minister Dominique Bussereau told reporters after he and Prime Minister Dominique de Villepin met a delegation of winemakers.

France and Italy are the world's top winemakers, with France accounting for around a fifth of world production, but New World countries have been increasing their market share.

Villepin said he would appoint officials in each of France's wine producing regions to coordinate marketing efforts and report to the Agriculture Ministry, rather than leaving it up to the regions to market their own wines, Bussereau said.

The winemakers backed the government's pledge to help boost exports.

"Faced with the decrease in French consumption, the salvation of the national wine-growing sector will come only from exports," said Dominique Granier, president of the southern Gard region's agriculture association.

Winemakers barricaded offices of a major wine industry group in Bordeaux earlier this month and others occupied an agriculture association's office in Nimes in protest at falling prices and competition from New World wines.

The French wine sector provides some 75,000 jobs but is suffering from changes in tastes among consumers. Over the last 40 years, alcohol consumption per head has decreased by more than a third in France.

Winemakers faced with the weaker domestic market needed to take a new approach to appeal to consumers abroad who are often mystified by labels on French wine bottles, Bussereau said.

"When they see Costieres du Gard, Saint Nicolas de Bourgueil or Chinon or Saumur-Champigny, they must wonder what that means," he said.

"We need to create generic brands and make a big effort to simplify what we offer because when you find a Chilean wine labelled Cabernet, Pinot Rouge, Pinot Noir, with an explanation, a colourful label ... that's what international consumers expect."

Winemakers in countries such as Australia, Chile, New Zealand and South Africa usually label their wines by the grapes used to make them - such as Cabernet Sauvignon or Pinot Noir - and often add a description of the wines' qualities.

The French usually label their wines by region, or even vineyard, but buyers who are not connoisseurs of the characteristics of a Saint Emilion or Pouilly Fuisse can be left wondering how they might taste.

Reply to
st.helier
Loading thread data ...

May I be so bold as to suggest a reduction in price???

Reply to
Ronin

Reply to
Joe "Beppe"Rosenberg

"Joe \"Beppe\"Rosenberg" wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@comcast.com:

Joe,

I suppose you are referring to the U.S. with your reasoning. First, I do not think that the U.S. market is the sole responsible for the decay in the sales of french wines and, second, I am convinced that the U.S. citizens are intelligent enough to separate the purchase intention of wine and the character or charisma of the political leaders of any country.

IMHO, the main problem with french wine, and specifically with Bordeaux is a problem of producing wine in un-appropiate land. When Bordeaux had a great reputation, both in the top of the line (which is mantained, I think) and the "more affordable" category, there was a strong incentive to plant vines in every single plot of land where the Bordeaux appellation was possible to achieve. As a result, tons and tons of mediocre grapes were picked and bad quality wine was produced with them.

This practice has a secondary effect in the form of reducing the image perception of the Bordeaux A.O.C. and, as result, nice wine and plonk are covered under a same label that does not mean quality anymore.

Only solution is, IMHO, to do a more restrictive selection of the vineyards under the appellation, and to declassify those vineyards or those wines that not reach an acceptable standard. Or let the market forces destroy the Bordeaux A.O.C. and see the good wines adopt another A.O.C. with a better peception.

About Robert Parker, I think he can be a great aid to those small Chateaux that produce good wines. Why? because he separates the good producers from the plonk ones. A Chateau without a reputation, bottling under a Bordeaux A.O.C. or a Cotes de Francs A.O.C. can sell his production in weeks if it makes good wine just because Robert Parker says "90". He does not care where the wine comes from. If the wine is good, he rates high. And, so, Robert Parker is the opposite of the A.O.C. system which equals of the wines under a mediocrity umbrella. Look at Reignac or Chateau des Francs as two examples of good producers of wine in not so well regarded plots of land in Bordeaux.

Finally, I can perfectly understand why the market favours a fruit forward nice Australian wine than a green, acidic and sour Bordeaux that costs 50% more. And it has nothing to be with politics ;-)

Best,

Santiago

Reply to
Santiago

I think we should have a new acronym--TIC for Tongue in Cheek so my posts can be understood.

As a member of RMP Jrs original "control group" I can attest to all the attributes Santiago mentioned.

The bottom line on why all but the 1st growths & super-seconds are "struggling" is that the Bordelaise have had their heads up their arse's every since the Spurrier tasting in the mid 70's. 95% of people who are buying fine wine today in Tokyo or Texas are looking at QPR not "prestige". The big score is bagging a WA 90 pointer, not a 2000 Meyney or a Mouton Cadet. While most of their countrymen in other regions except Burgundy, are "selling" their wines with attractive prices and packaging, the Medoc greedheads stick to their old ways with a multiplicity of sources and pricing that is ego-driven. This first tranche/second tranche mumbo-jumbo is valid for the "hot" estates and Franco-philes who buy anything they can't pronounce. I imagine less then 5% of the global market still buys wine for their prestige. But that universe now includes Super-Tuscans, California cults. a few Aussies and Spanish wines--almost all backed up by a WA or WS review.

Reply to
Joe "Beppe"Rosenberg

SNIP

SNIP

I shoudl think they would - it hasn't been called that for some years now - try Costieres de Nimes instead

We are obviously not the only ones to have gormelss politicians.

Timothy Hartley

Reply to
Timothy Hartley

Timothy Hartley wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@dd30.orpheusnet.co.uk:

Hey he is only the Agriclulture expert what do you want? besides, I love that the Loire Valley wines he mentions are truly affordable, don't really want Saumur Champigny and Chinon and Bourgueil to becomes cult wines.

The bottom line is probably more like what Santiago said, increase the quality and let the properties that don't make good wine go back to growing fruit trees or other agricultural products.

What the article hints at is encouraging plonk by "broadening" the appeal and marketability rather than by encouraging the production of good stuff.

Reply to
Joseph Coulter

DrinksForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.