To get away from the "i said , you said" part of the other thread, I thought I'd start a new one.
Here are my postulates:
1)The vast majority of wines, New or Old World, have SO² added.
2) In US, wines with sulfites added must say so on the label
If anyone disagrees with those, start your own damn thread :)
Now, the question comes up, are French winemakers somehow devious sorts who lie about postulate 1 to every American who comes in? One poster claims to have met with dozens of American travelers, all of whom were told by French winemakers they don't add sulfites. I find it difficult to believe this (since a pretty good proportion of those who visit wineries are in fact "geeks" - unlike US wineries to my knowledge are not for the most part on the tour bus trail - and would call them on this). The French winemakers I have met are very straightforward in talking re their vinification practices.
So here's the poll: A)How many have visited a French winemaker(s)?
B)Did that winemaker(s) say they did not use sulfites as a stablizing factor?
C)If so, who is this producer?
We should get an idea re the truth this way.
My theory is a little different. I think that some Americans (probably mostly traveling in cities, not visiting wineries) notice that there are no "contains sulfites" labels on wines in France. They have a great time. They decide that it's the (supposed) lack of sulfites that make these wines so enjoyable (ignoring the fact that everything is better when you're on vacation) and in some cases that they don't get headaches (never mind that neither sulfites nor histamines are likely factors in 99% of headaches). Dale
Dale Williams Drop "damnspam" to reply