Questions about Graham Vintage Ports

Sep 18, 2003 3 Replies

Because of a recent change in the law here in Idaho, wine stores may now sell port. A store near me just got several bottles Graham Vingtage Port for the following vintages and prices:


1977 (USD119)


1983 (USD64)


1985 (USD78)


1991 (USD74)



I've been trying to get some information about these wines -- specifically tasting notes and estimated maturity windows. So far, all I can find are Robert Parker's points given -- 95 for the '77, 94 for '83, 97 for the '85, and 94 for the '91.



I'd like a top bottle of vintage port that I can drink now or at some point over the next few years. Does anyone have any notes, experience, or comments on these wines?


Thanks,



Rob Adelson


The 70 Graham is very decent. Depends on where it was bottled - be careful, I've had bottles with a Fonseca label and a Grahams cork (bottled in England)

The 77 has been an underachiever for me, compared to its reviews, although recent bottles seem to be getting a bit better.

The 83 needed more time when I had it last year, albeit from a magnum.

The 85 was quite forward and very drinkable last time I tried it.

Try the Malvedos ports made by Grahams in lesser vintages as well - some are excellent.

This one is the only one I remember tasting, and even from a 375 recently the

1983 seemed to need more time. 1985 Ports in general, on the other hand, to me seem early maturing (as Bill indicates for the Graham). . Dale

Dale Williams Drop "damnspam" to reply

Those look to be pretty good prices. I paid a bit more for my 77 here in San Francisco. I'd actually buy the 77 to drink now...I really enjoy this one-- some might say hold it though. I certainly wouldn't. I would buy some of the 83 and 85 to hang onto for a bit. Though I have had a glass of the 83 at a restauraunt and liked it quite a bit. It is hard to tell in comparison with the 77 if not side by side...not much of note taker here I'm afraid.

Basically those are great prices (I know I said pretty good before, but I ruminated while I typed) and unless they have been really poorly stored (port is quite durable) I'd definately go for more than one...

M.Leduc

ML

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required