sugar alcohol

I had not heard the term and googled it:

Looks like they mean things like sorbitol and mannitol which are made by hydrogenation of sucrose, are sweet, but caloric content is lower.

Funny sorbitol is not as effective as I thought it was. I was told they used to make sorbitol candy but it has a laxative effect since it is largely undigested.

Reading labels is good for you!

It means sugar "substitutes" such as maltitol, sorbitol, and so forth. Look at the ingredients. If it ends in "ol" it's probably a sugar alconol. Labelling of these products is somewhat deceptive. It is allowable to state "sugar free" or as on yours, low sugar on the label where these ingredients are used, yet they definitly add to carbohydrate counts. You may even see claims that it has "low impact" carbs or similar nonsense. It is less carbs, but sugar free does not mean carb free.

Federal nutritional labelling laws apply only to the "carbohydrates" as listed on the nutritional panel. All other carb claims are unregulated and have more to do with marketing than nutrition.

Try this. In the store, pick up two similar candy packages, one regular, one marked sugar free. Then look at the carbohydrates. The sugar free will be lower but by no means will it be the low carb candy you might expect. Also look at the number of pieces you get for a given amount of carbs. You will get a little more with sugar free but by no means is it neutral or "free" food. Given that real sugar still tastes better you may as well eat the real thing, just a little less, and enjoy it more.

Sugar alcohols can be hard to digest and cause distress to many people. Some people can eat lots of this stuff but I am not one of them. If you're trying to lose weight, or follow a low carb regimen, eating this stuff with the presumption that it has no impact can mess up your plan. Fact is some people metabolize these carbs, and some don't. If you metabolize them, you get an impact.

Here's a comparison, data from the Hershey's website:

Twizzlers: Sugar free, 6 pc serving, 34g carbs. Regular, 4pc serving, 36g carbs.

Not all that much different.

Here's a pretty good explanation of why these products aren't as great as the claims make them sound, and a debunking of "net carbs/low impact carbs" labelling:

Here's another:

And of course the obligatory wiki reference:

HTH.

MartyB

It means it contains a product that is a known laxative. Don't buy it!

Why are you trying to cut sugar consumption? Sugar in and of itself isn't a bad thing unless perhaps you have reactive hypoglycemia, pre-diabetes or diabetes. And then you need to watch your overall carbs. So a large fruit salad could be worse for you than a small piece of candy.

It's still made. Available in most any grocery or drug store. Mainly aimed at diabetics and dieters but IMO it's really bad stuff.

I'm still unclear on the concept. For someone pre-diabetic, should he treat sugar alcohol like sugar?

And what is the relationship between carbs and sugar?

Sugar alcohol can raise blood sugar. The only way to tell if it will for you is to test your blood sugar before you eat whatever the food is and then test again 2 hours later. I don't eat sugar alcohols but I do have gum on occasion. I can have one piece. I used to chew a whole pack of small pieces at a time and that would raise my blood sugar.

In most countries you would have to say which sugar alcohol by name.

Or cheapskate Austrian wine makers. The antidote to ethelene glycol poisoning such as there is one is to dose the patient with ethanol.

Regards, Martin Brown

Like I said, I never heard of the term and I spent a summer, ages ago, on a summer job as an analytical lab tech where we monitored the conversion of glucose and sucrose to sorbitol and mannitol. They were sold as food additives or converted to surfactants, explosives and other derivatives.

To me, it is a manufactured term for use in marketing. Makes it sound like a type of sugar, which it is not.

Does not fit the carbohydrate definition:

carbohydrate: any of a large group of organic compounds, including sugars, such as sucrose, and polysaccharides, such as cellulose, glycogen, and starch, that contain carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen, with the general formula Cm(H2O)n: an important source of food and energy for animals

Some responses to your question appear only in rec.food.cooking as the crossposted groups have been removed by responders.

Hi Mike point of interest - In the late '80s a well-known Australian wine company was finrd for illegally adding sorbitol to its wines.

Cheers!

Martin