TN '04 Fevre Chablis

Jean and I went out for a rare meal without Andrew these days and took ourselves out to a very nice resaurant in Indy: Elements

formatting link
the high point of the meal was our entrees, which were Alaskan halibut over kohlrabi, baby bok choy and maitake mushrooms, all in a white wine-miso broth. With that, we had:

2004 William Fevre Chablis nose: initially, rather reticent, minerals and a hint of fruit palate: grapfruit, seaweed, minerals, good acidity, no noticeable new oak, later becoming more open with lemony fruit while maintaining good minerality

Earlier, with our starters, we had:

NV Laurent-Perrier Champagne nose: toasty, biscuits palate: toast, rounded, fine mousse, low acid

Overall, a very fine meal and a fun night out.

Mark Lipton

Reply to
Mark Lipton
Loading thread data ...

The Fevres are getting great press. Used to be super-oaky, but seems like around '01 started cutting back, and by '04 well into the low-oak camp. Thanks for nice notes

Reply to
DaleW

Yes. I was initially hesitant to get the Fevre, having read your accounts of oaky wines from them back in the '90s. However, I too had read some accounts of good experiences with recent Fevres from people like Jay Miller or Jim Cowan, whose palates are not too far from my own, so I decided to give it a whirl. The other Chablis on the list was from Seguinot-Bordet. They're imported by J et R in Michigan, and I've had their '99 before at a J et R tasting (and duly reported here), but wasn't wowed by it. In retrospect, I wish I could have tried both ;-)

Mark Lipton

Reply to
Mark Lipton

DrinksForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.