TN: 1956-1985 Nebbiolos, plus white truffles, Champagne, dessert wines

Ben and Wendy hosted our group for an "Mature Piedmont and White Truffle" d inner in their lovely Greenwich Village loft last night. They did all the c ooking, David procured the truffles, Diane and Suzanne were great as shaver s/servers.

We sat down to prosciutto, speck, and pear, with a pair of bubblies

2009 Pierre Peters "Les Chetillons" Champagne Apparently released before the '08. Young but quite friendly, maybe a tad f uller than I expected, noticeable dosage, but bright citrus and mineral not es. I quite enjoy, even if not one for the ages. B+/A-

2002 Bollinger Grande Annee Full, toasty, nice just not the style I gravitate towards, others liked mor e. B

Then a perfect sous vide egg with truffles

1956 Giuseppe Rinaldi Barolo Darker than expected, still some fruit, perfectly present. Someone said tha t Jamie W. suggested this might not be 100% Nebbiolo. Whatever they did wor ked, first drinkable '56 (from anywhere) I've seen. B-

1964 G. Borgogno Barolo Riserva (original) Very light color, very floral, a little caramel over red fruit, clear winne r of flight to me, B+

1964 Ricardo Ceretto Barolo Riserva A little volatile and a lot musty at first, but seemed more dank that TCA, but with time it's clearly corked.

Tajarin ( tagliatelle) with truffles. Ben used 28 egg yolks for one kilo of 00 flour!

1967 Burlotto Barolo Fully mature, maybe a little past fully mature, but a lovely dowager - eleg ant, floral, tarry, fine. B+/A-

1967 Renato Ratti Barolo Marcenasco I didn't like this at first, sour with tacky tannin remaining, but improves a lot with air, ends up being a pretty nice Barolo. B/B+

1967 Prunotto " Pora"\ Barbaresco Riserva Freshest, darkest, fuller plummy fruit, nice length. B+/A-

1970 Barale Barolo Very dark for older Nebbiolo.Black fruits, a little tobacco, good length I like but not what I expected. B/B+

1970 Ricardo Ceretto Barolo Sweet fruit, roses, a little tar, moderate finish (I think I liked more tha n others) B/B+

1970 Produttori del Barbaresco "Pora" Barbaresco Riserva Corked

There was a great rib roast, with green beans

1971 Firoina Barberesco Reserva Full, rich lots of gusto here. B+/A-,

1971 Produttori del Barbaresco " Rabaja" Barbaresco Riserva Weird showing, this had a chemically edge to it (though I think someone sai d maple syrup as well) C

1971 Produttori del Barbaresco Barbaresco A little thin compared to others, but sweet cherry fruit and some autumn le aves, only slightly tired. B

1974 Giovanni Accomasso Barolo New producer for me, but candidate of my WOTN. Nice red fruit, tar, rose pe tals, long finish. B+/A-

1985 G. Mascarello "Monprivato" Barolo Quite ripe (some found roasted, I thought just on verge), rounder and more mature than I've expected, maybe not pristine but I didn't think flawed. B+

1985 Barale "Castellero " Barolo Riserva Full;lush but balanced, some tar and smoke. B+/A-

1985 Produttori del Barbaresco Barbaresco Served nicely cool, fresh acids, herby. B+

For those that ate dessert homemade vanilla ice cream with truffles

Two dessert wines

2001 Ch. Guiraud Sauternes Fleshy but with that 2001 acidity to support, orange marmalade and some apr icot, firm and long. A-/B+

1993 Monsanto Vin Santo (from 2 375s) This was weird and chemical to me, like Monsanto meets Dow meets Duport. Sy rup, caramel, and a little bug spray with some oxidative notes to boot. Not for me. C-

Lots of very good wines, though I was surprised there wasn't one or two tha t made it into wow territory for me. Still, lots of lovely wines, and super b food. Thanks to David for sourcing the truffles in a tough year- these we re better than reports, though nose outpaced palate by a bit. Great company , fun night.

Grade disclaimer: I'm a very easy grader, basically A is an excellent wine, B a good wine, C drinkable. Anything below C means I wouldn't drink at a p arty where it was only choice.Furthermore, I offer no promises of objectivi ty, accuracy, and certainly not of consistency.

Reply to
DaleW
Loading thread data ...

I should have noted bottle treatment. About half the bottles (like my Burlo tto) had been handed off to Ben in advance, he double-decanted midday (in d ecanter for an hour or so and then back into decanter). Others were mostly also double-decanted earlier in day.

Pic:

formatting link

Reply to
DaleW

dinner in their lovely Greenwich Village loft last night. They did all the cooking, David procured the truffles, Diane and Suzanne were great as shav ers/servers.

fuller than I expected, noticeable dosage, but bright citrus and mineral n otes. I quite enjoy, even if not one for the ages. B+/A-

hat Jamie W. suggested this might not be 100% Nebbiolo. Whatever they did w orked, first drinkable '56 (from anywhere) I've seen. B-

ner of flight to me, B+

, but with time it's clearly corked.

egant, floral, tarry, fine. B+/A-

es a lot with air, ends up being a pretty nice Barolo. B/B+

I like but not what I expected. B/B+

han others) B/B+

aid maple syrup as well)

leaves, only slightly tired. B

petals, long finish. B+/A-

e mature than I've expected, maybe not pristine but I didn't think flawed. B+

pricot, firm and long. A-/B+

Syrup, caramel, and a little bug spray with some oxidative notes to boot. N ot for me. C-

hat made it into wow territory for me. Still, lots of lovely wines, and sup erb food. Thanks to David for sourcing the truffles in a tough year- these were better than reports, though nose outpaced palate by a bit. Great compa ny, fun night.

e, B a good wine, C drinkable. Anything below C means I wouldn't drink at a party where it was only choice.Furthermore, I offer no promises of objecti vity, accuracy, and certainly not of consistency.

Thanks for the notes. There seems to be a lot of older Borgogno around the se days. I've had two bottlings from the 1950's recently. Neither one was remarkable and both were showing their age ('54 and '59)

Reply to
Bi!!

Borgogno has a huge library program releasing topped off wine. Most people prefer the original releases (red capsules).

Reply to
DaleW

DrinksForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.