TN: 8 pairs of '95/'96 Bdx, plus Taittinger, ZH, Jadot, Carbonnieux blanc

h, back to wine. Friday Patrick was in town from CO and a nice group met at Fabio Cucina Italiana for a 1995/1996 Bordeaux showdown. 8 people, 16 bott les of red Bordeaux (plus 4 starters). Everyone kept saying "too much wine" but no one offered to not bring theirs.

We started with some assorted appetizers- crabcake, calamari, and buffalo m ozzarella with prosciutto. And the starting wines:

1999 Taittinger Comtes de Champagne Another good showing of a fave, fullbodied yet with a sense of lightness, v ery fresh, clean Bosc pear with brioche, citrus peel, and chalky accents. G ood length. A-

1999 Carbonnieux blanc Fresh fruit with an interesting waxy note but oak pretty dominant, and good use a little more acidic grip. B

2010 Jadot (Magenta) "La Garenne" Puligny-Montrachet This seemed a bit tight when I first had, but I really liked on a revisit. Apple and citrus deftly accented by light oak touches. Very good acids, bri ght and young. A-/B+

2009 Zind-Humbrecht "Clos st Urbain" Gewurztraminer This was a 3 (midpoint) on the ZH scale- plenty of sugar (modern Spatlese/o ld style Auslese levels), A bit ponderous for my tastes. I think I liked a sip as afterwards a bit more, but my initial note says B-

On to the pairings. Wines were paired but blind. Patrick paired and wrapped them, and then Ramon numbered pairs. So they also didn't know what was in each flight.

8A More tannic than B, young, a little herbal note, good. B 8B Redder fruit, cigarbox, very good,. A-/B+

We had a trio of pastas here

7A Cassis, graphite, brawny. B/B+ 7B Also blackcurrant, cedar, similar but maybe a bit more restrained.B/B+

6A Soft texture, black fruits, pretty open. B+

6B Redder fruits, quite tannic, needs time. B

5A Lovely, my fave so far, elegant and long with a lot of stuffing. A-

5B So corked I couldn't get my face to glass!

for main I had chicken breast in a porcini sauce

4A Lush, balanced, fruit framed by some nice minty herbal notes (I was thin king this was Pichon Lalande)A- 4B Firm, young, maybe most in need of time. B+/B for now

3 A Good, balanced, nice finish. B+

3B Big, full, lush fruit with lots of, tobacco. A-/B+

2A Black fruit, pencil lead, an odd note- eventually conclude mildly corked

2B Full, red and black fruits, pencil lead. B+

1A Somewhat kirschy, medium bodied, sweet. B+/B

1B Very good, more open than some, cassis with tobacco and cedar shavings. A-/B+

8A 1996 Calon Segur

8B 1995 Calon Segur 7A 1995 Grand Puy Lacoste 7B 1996 Grand Puy Lacoste 6A1996 Magdelaine 6B 1995 Magdelaine 5A 1995 Pichon Lalande 5B 1996 Pichon Lalande 4A 1995 Cos d'Estournel 4B 1996 Cos d'Estournel 3 A 1995 Ducru-Beaucaillou 3B 1996 Ducru-Beaucaillou 2A 1996 Pichon Baron 2B 1995 Pichon Baron 1A 1995 Leoville Poyferre 1B 1996 Leoville Poyferre

OK, first of all the most surprising thing to me is that I liked a '96 St E milion more than a '95. Second was that my favorite wines included the '95 Cos, which didn't show well last time I had. I had a slight edge overall to the '96 Medocs, but '95s showed well too and with the exception of the cor ked wines there was nothing I wouldn't be happy to have on my dinner table. Certainly not a night where I felt one vintage showed clearly superior, lo ts of super wines (most of which need time).

Fun night, great crowd.

Grade disclaimer: I'm a very easy grader, basically A is an excellent wine, B a good wine, C drinkable. Anything below C means I wouldn't drink at a p arty where it was only choice.Furthermore, I offer no promises of objectivi ty, accuracy, and certainly not of consistency.

Reply to
DaleW
Loading thread data ...

DrinksForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.