Thursday Betsy was away, David ate leftovers before I got home late from a meeting, so I stopped and grabbed a couple slices of (unfortunately awful) pizza. Opened a cheap regional Bordeaux, the 2001 Ch. Peyrot (Bordeaux). Somewhat grapey nose, ponderous dark fruit on the palate. Not especially tannic, but the tannins have a coarse edge to them. I'm not enjoying this, and decide to dump glass and try again next night. A glass of the 2003 Leitz Dragonstone that I had opened previous night is much better company to some old XTC tunes.
The next night David is dining with friends, and I can't stand the idea of cooking for myself (pre-Betsy I did it all the time, now it makes me lonely). So I invite some friends over for dinner, and grill a big chewy but flavorful London broil, along with squash. While we're grilling, we have the 2002 Clos Roche Blanche Sauvignon Blanc (Touraine). Seems fruitier/riper than other recent vintages of this, lemon/citrus notes with a surprising tropical edge. Usually I love 2002 Loires, and this is good, but to my tastes no better than other recent vintages. Still, great QPR at $10ish. B+
Then we give the Peyrot another shot. A day has taken the edge off the tannins, but I still don't like. Low-acid yet with a green herbal edge to it. Let's look at label: made by Didier Delas, selected by A. Urbini & partners,
Luckily, I also decanted a 2000 Bernadotte (Haut-Medoc) to go with the meat. The firat two times I tried this (immediately on release, one of the first 2000 Bordeaux I tried) I was not especially impressed, and wondered re travel shock. The bottles since have been delightful for a $15 Bordeaux. Aromatic nose of smoke, cherries,and cedar. Good red fruit and balanced acidity, moderate cedary oak and some tobacco notes. Nice finish. B+
During dinner we had a discussion of BBQ (as a NC boy I had strong opinions, coming down in favor of the Eastern NC style of pulled pork). So when the following night at 8 pm I found myself again facing the prospect of eating alone, I decided to not cook and picked up some prepared "pulled pork BBQ" and coleslaw. I know, I know. Stuff was pretty dreadful - as far from Eastern NC as you could get, a sweet-tomatoey sauce. I choked it down, and consoled myself by opening what I thought was a 375 of 2001 Roumier. As I poured I realized it was in fact the 2000 Roumier Chambolle-Musigny. In any case, nice perfumed nose, black cherry and raspberry fruit, nice balance. There's a clear mineral edge to the finish. Horrible with the so-called BBQ, so I stick to water. Finish the Chambolle while listening to Elvis Costello and Neil Young, nice when the stuff you're drinking and the stuff you're listening to both grab your attention (in a good way). I know 2000 isn't a "hot" vintage, but I really like this wine. A- Sunday Betsy's still away, but I get some socializing in by brunching with friends at an Indian place. That night David is home for dinner. I decide the appropriate meal for male-bonding is burgers, so throw some buffalo burgers on the grill. I open the 2002 Castaño Hecula (Yecla). This is my favorite of the Castano's, I like better than the slightly cheaper Monstrell or the slightly more expensive Solanera. Big red fruit, moderate tannins. Good concentration for the price, though there's a sweetness here I find a little off-putting. Still, a decent burger wine, worth it's $11 tag. B/B+
Luckily Betsy got back this AM, so I have a couple of days of real cooking before she leaves for concerts in Maine. Grade disclaimer: I'm a very easy grader, basically A is an excellent wine, B a good wine, C mediocre. Anything below C means I wouldn't drink at a party where it was only choice. Furthermore, I offer no promises of objectivity, accuracy, and certainly not of consistency. Dale
Dale Williams Drop "damnspam" to reply