TN Chateau Gruaud-Larose 1961

Chateau Gruaud-Larose 1961 is at the peak and likely will hold a few more years. It is still rather dark scarlet with only little evidence of age around the rim. Everything now is in balance. It is classic St. Julien that has much more depth and length than usual, as is typical of most of the top Bordeaux wines of the exceptional year of 1961. Ducru-Beaucaillou 1961 perhaps was a bit better with more depth and complexity when I tasted it a few years ago. Of course the star of 1961 is Latour. However the quality of the 1961 Gruaud-Larose is as high as that of many of the first growths in many other good years. If you have not cellared the 1961s as I have and have to buy them now, all of the decent ones are fairly expensive. However the Gruaud-Larose likely offers as much quality for the price as any of the 1961s. You now would have to pay a small fortune at auction for the much desired Latorur

1961.

Reply to snipped-for-privacy@cwdjr.net .

Reply to
Cwdjrx _
Loading thread data ...

Thanks for the notes. I'm organizing a Gruaud vertical next week, unfortunately we won't have the '61 ('66 is oldest, but we have every major vintage since then). But this way I get to at least taste the '61 vicariously. :)

Reply to
DaleW

"DaleW" wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com:

Where? Can I come?

Fred.

Reply to
Fred

Dale Williams stated: "Thanks for the notes. I'm organizing a Gruaud vertical next week, unfortunately we won't have the '61 ('66 is oldest, but we have every major vintage since then). But this way I get to at least taste the '61 vicariously. :)"

I find that both Michael Broadbent and Clive Coates also liked the 1961 Gruaud-Larose in fairly recent tastings. Broadbent still rated it as 5 out of 5 star. I believe Coates rated it as about 17.5 out of 20, but then Coates tends not to give out as many of the very highest ratings as many others. Unfortunately I do not have a wide range in Gruaud-Larose vintages. Your upcoming tasting should produce some interesting notes for you to post here.

Reply to snipped-for-privacy@cwdjr.net .

Reply to
Cwdjrx _

Thanks for the notes and taste check.

I've only 2 of the 61's left and have my last tasting was in '85 when my notes said "don't touch the other two for at least 8-10 years.

I've still several of the '61 Gloria's ... one of my all time favorite "best buy" Bordeauxs and I use them as kind of a bench mark to warn me about when to pop the last of the Larose's

Art Stratemeyer ============================

formatting link
A Community Celebration the Joy of Wine,Gardening and the Arts

Cellar! Wine Software

formatting link

Reply to
Art Stratemeyer

Of the few '61s that I've had, the standout was the Lynch Bages, which should sell for roughly the same amount as the Gruaud-Larose. Having not tasted the latter, I can't offer any sort of comparison except to say that the Lynch Bages was exceptional, too. Thanks for the notes, BTW -- most interesting.

Mark Lipton

Reply to
Mark Lipton

Mark Lipton stated: "Of the few '61s that I've had, the standout was the Lynch Bages, which should sell for roughly the same amount as the Gruaud-Larose. Having not tasted the latter, I can't offer any sort of comparison except to say that the Lynch Bages was exceptional, too. Thanks for the notes, BTW -- most interesting."

I just looked up auction prices for several 1961s in the March issue of Decanter. Prices are for a case of 12 bottles in Pounds. They include buyer premiums, but not VAT.

Latour - 34100; Petrus - 32000; Mouton-Rothschild - 5750; Palmer - 4180; Lynch-Bages - 2035; Ducru-Beaucaillou - 1925; Gruaud-Larose - 1744;

The price of 61 Latour started going into orbit a few years ago, and now it costs several thousand $US per bottle. It is a bit more expensive than even the 61 Petrus, and it is equal to the quote of 34100 Pounds for a case of 1985 Romanee-Conti which is the most expensive one from

1960 through 1990. The least expensive 61 Bordeaux on the Decanter listing is 315 Pounds for a case of Talbot.

Reply to snipped-for-privacy@cwdjr.net .

Reply to
Cwdjrx _

Fred, a week from today in Manhattan. Alas, we already have a waiting list (we limit to 12 to ensure everyone a decent pour). I'm really looking forward to this- we have '66, '70, '75, '78, '81, '82, '83, '85, '86, '88, '89, '90, '94, '95, '96, '97, '99, '00, & '01. If of course someone had the '61, I might could convince group to go to 13 :) Seriously, if anyone is in NY area and is interested in being on notice list re tastings (generally BDx verticals and horizontals for this particular group), drop me a line.

Reply to
DaleW
Reply to
Michael Pronay

"DaleW" wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:

Damn. I'm a few thousand miles away (Las Vegas). It sounds like a good time.

Fred.

Reply to
Fred

DrinksForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.