TN: Good Italian whites, and some matching hits/misses

Monday we had a new roast chicken recipe (from Judy Rodgers at Zuni Cafe, a light spice rub then aired in fridge for 2 days). Served some opened 2000 Lanessan (previously noted), and the 2002 Scarbolo Pinot Grigio. Light crisp wine with green apple fruit accented by a hint of lime, not really big enough to stand up to the chicken (though the spices were subtle). Decent enough summer quaffer though, a B on my easy scale. Actually, the PG was too light, and the Bordeaux was too much, this dish would have gone well with a bigger white or a lighter red. As has happened before, I found myself preferring the red with the dark meat and the white with the breast.
Tuesday was beef stroganoff. Betsy has 2 stroganoff recipes, a Pierre Franey and the one she calls "1950s cookbook." This was the older one (the only recipe I know that Betsy uses canned soup in!), tasty Middle America comfort food. This time I tried the 2001 Ste.-Anne Bandol Rosé. Somewhat austere, a bit herbal (not green, I mean herbs), stern cherry fruit. I liked it, but Betsy didn't. I thought it a decent match, though good Beaujolais or Loire cab franc remains my favorite stroganoff match. As night wore on I liked the rosé even more, it seemed to become more open and inviting. I'd give a B+, though I probably won't buy more (there are too many wines we both like to stock ones she doesn't, except Savennières).
Wednesday I had to speak at a fundraising reception at a local college, the choices at the bar were limited, I tried the 2001 Fetzer Sundial Chardonnay. Low expectations are the way to go, this wasn't that bad for a wine that retails for I think $7-8. The tropical fruit profile isn't my favorite, but it doesn't have that oak-chippy woodiness that afflicts so many inexpensive CalChards. Reasonably light, bright wine- don't think I'll buy any, but an acceptable choice in this situation. B
Got home, Betsy had dinner almost ready, just needed 10 minutes to heat grill and a few more to grill some marinated scallops and shrimp. The seafood was part of an Asian salad over snow peas, red pepper, and noodles; we tried the 2003 Anselmi San Vincenzo (no longer Soave). I opened with anticipation, after a flurry of notes re this wine (or at least 2002). Wait, it's not what I expect. Sure it's good- pear and Fuji apple fruit, kind of a mineral/wet stone thing, good finish. But this is not the light clean crisp wine I expected. Ok, it's reasonably crisp and certainly clean. But this is a much bigger wine than I expected. It's at least as good a wine as I expected, just more. B+/A-
Thursday was a long day, we ate late with a beef stew with dried fruits from a crockpot. I tried the 1990 Vidal-Fleury Vacqueyras. Definite browning. Initial nose has some intriguing smoke, sweat, earth, and barnyard, but the fruit has a stewed quality. This probably should have been drunk 4-5 years ago in any case, but was a cheap bin-end from a slightly dubious source -my guess is this had seen some high temps. C- for this bottle
Friday was opening night for opera season, Betsy was working so I ate leftovers alone. I had recently picked up a couple of 375s of the 1998 Ch. Faizeau VV (Montagne-St.Émilion). This was a wine I had liked at $13, but drank them all. So when I saw the halves at $8 I got a few. After a little air, nice floral/earthy nose. Raspberry and black cherry fruit, medium-bodied, long finish for an inexpensive Bdx. B+
Grade disclaimer: I'm a very easy grader, basically A is an excellent wine, B a good wine, C mediocre. Anything below C means I wouldn't drink at a party where it was only choice.
Dale Williams Drop "damnspam" to reply
Reply to
Dale Williams

Site Timeline Threads

DrinksForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.