I don't like to criticise people who have sacrificed time and effort in putting on the Huddersfield beer festival, but surely there are improvement that could be made.
Firstly, the venue is awful. It's cramped, dark and utterly unwelcoming. By mid afternoon on Friday, it was virtually impossible to get to the beer, such was the congestion in the main hall. And it's not as though there were all that many people there - it's simply because there's not enough space to hold an event of this kind.
Secondly, the choice of beer was disappointing. The vast majority of beers were local. I lost count of the time that I overheard people comment on the logic of supplying beer that is so regularly and freely available in local pubs, when all they really want to do is sample beers from further afield. What on earth is the point?
Unfortunately, CAMRA have a new 'LocAle' campaign, encouraging pubs to supply beers from local breweries. OK, that's fine in a limited sense particularly in encouraging pubs to have at least one beer from local sources, but should it be applied to beer festivals? Surely a beer festival is the opportunity for local people to sample beers from other parts of the country.
To repeat my first comment, I know the planning and effort that goes into the organisation of beer festivals. It all normally revolves around a very few people who do a heck of a lot of work, and long may that continue. It's the planning stage - ie the choice of venue, and the choice of beers - at which festival organisers such as those at Huddersfield need to take a long hard look.