wild bowmores

Dec 21, 2003 7 Replies

Finally managed to crack all the Bowmores that had been on sale between $24.99 and $29.99 in Milwaukee (though I didn't get a 'Dusk'--yet!; lost 7 pounds on Atkins in the interim). It turned out to be a really interesting comparison. In short:


Bowmore 12: is light and clean with a pretty peat finish; a cool, smooth river of peat on a light frame (I think I am repeating myself; at least I'm consistent); it is a fine everyday whisky; a little charmer.



Bowmore 15 (Mariner): is a mellow-packet with odd notes; in some ways sophisticated, in some ways plagued by off-flavors to start, there is a touch off/eccentric palate that takes this whisky perfumy in directions it shouldn't go before the peat starts, very slowly, to settle in on the finish; I've had this for a month or so, and I'm going to wait a couple years before getting this one again, and hopefully it will still cost $29.99.



Bowmore Darkest: This is a tale of two whiskies--a mellow sherry start and an incongruous peat finish; the sherry is not the mind-wrenching individuality of A'Bunadh, it is not the rubbed richness of Macallan, instead it is a bit of a sweet, thin thing that lets you fall asleep until the twinge of Bowmore peat comes along and wakes you up like a splash of lukewarm Islay springwater; for me this is a curiousity of an unintegrated combination of elements; it might impress and intrigue guests as something interesting and classy, but to me it doesn't work--plain, tired sherry and that touch of Bowmore peat at the end are an oddball combination. I've had this open for a couple of weeks and the impressions stay consistent.



Bowmore Dawn: The first sip was horrid--then, everything started making sense; this is a pungent, winey product that starts to suggest problems, problems, problems--but the longer it lingers, and the more you reach for it, the more remarkable it becomes; it certainly has a quality of 'perfume' reminiscent of FWP, and it has the oddity of the initial flavors of the Bowmore Mariner 15 (which I also enjoyed once, but not more than once), and it has the contrast between a pungent start and incoming peat that can make other Bowmores seem unsettling--but somehow this one WORKS; the strong, winey, perfumey start is almost offensive--but it starts to spead across the palate, and BLEND seamlessly with the lingering peat--it is an interesting combination (and at 51.5% there is a kind of tangy almost 'uric acid'-like potency to make it a sea-salty, fish-in-the-face-whallopsy whole); this is a perfumey, almost FWP-ish, wine-pungent "whisky product" that sweeps a smooth wave across the palate. If FWP was ever a problem, here, it (if 'it' is really there) seems like a solution. In this case the understated and odd excesses that make the 15 mellowly flawed, and the Darkest disappointing, make the Dawn boldly and intriguingly potent, broadly sweeping, and fun. In this case, oddly added production elements work to create an intriguingly unctuous monster that doesn't stray far from the hand. It hits the palate brightly, and fades psychedically into a very pretty sunset. It is not "of this world" as such a mixture of salt, fruit, and savory normally would be, in the normal whisky panoply. But in this case, the truly otherworldly combination works poppingly.


(As usual, individual bottlings, palates, and imaginations may vary!!!)


And maybe it will be different after the Dawn has been open for a couple weeks!?!


[snipped an excellent discussion]

Great work as usual, Douglas!

And apropos. I saw yesterday a holiday gift pack of Bowmore (12yo I think) with three minatures included as a premium. One was the Darkest, I think the others were the Dawn and Dusk, though maybe one was the Mariner. A little bit tempting because I haven't tried the Darkest, Dawn, or Dusk and I know what to expect with the 12yo - or the Mariner which I liked a little better than you did. I've been a little afraid of the wine finishes because Bowmore, while great when it's at it's best, is a little unpredictable.

Also saw another version of the 21yo, with an entirely gold leaf label - the 25th anniversary of something edition. That makes, how many, about a hundred different OB expressions on the market simultaneously! Maybe they should just put the date of distillation, date of bottling, and cask number on the labels like Signatory does...

Bart

And I thought it was just me! When I read this I decided to go back to my tasting log. There, under Bowmore, were no less than 30 different bottling listings with around 70 impressions. And that is over a 5 year period. I think that Bowmore has been rather prolific with their marketing variety, at least from what I see in the US. I guess Bowmore means BowMORE!

great when it's at it's best, is a little unpredictable.

I've approached the Dawn a couple times since first opening it--and every time it is an experience. It's not necessarily a positive experience, or a negative experience, and it produces a whole variety of facial expressions. There is definitely a hard-hitting perfume punch. And I don't know if I like it, or think it's too weird, or dislike it, actually. But I keep trying it. This is a carnival fun house whisky with trap doors, quaking floorboards, and sudden blasts of whimsy.

Fear not the Darkest Bowmore, for it is beyond compare. (I love it!)

Bob

After seeing a few references to Bowmore 12 being a nice, peaty dram, I decided to risk another bottle and see if the dreaded FWP was truly gone. Having encountered FWP several times, and consequently pouring an almost full bottle down the drain, I was hesitant. REAL hesitant. But several years of Bowmore-free living convinced me to go back into the water (of life, Bowmore style). And I'm very glad I did: no FWP at all, just a fine, peaty dram that completes a powerhouse foursome with Ardbeg 10, Lagavulin 16, and Laphroaig 10. (And, BTW, the Signatory Vintage Islay 5 yo is also quite a peaty dram.) Thanks for all the positive Bowmore posts: it's good to have it back! Cheers, Ed

I'm SO jealous that you went an entire DECADE without a bath soap bottle!

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required