1999 Clos du Marquis

Mark,

Low-acidity wasn't a defining part of the vintage to my mind. There were some wines I thought quite fat- mostly Right Bankers such as L'Angelus, Clos Fourtet, La Gomerie, La Tour Carnet. And a couple of Medocs like Pichon Baron. Most of those St. Emilions are definitely in a modern style, I attributed the low acidity to "Parkerization" as much as vintage.

But a variety of other Medocs- Leoville Poyferre, du Tertre, Montrose spring to mind- had acidity that fit my parameters for "normal" in Bordeaux.

To me, 1999 was a vintage characterized by light to moderate tannins, medium concentration of fruit, more aromatically advanced than most. All of those things mean that in most cases I'm drinking on early end. Low-acidity would make early drinking even more suggested. As I said before, the Montrose is only one I intend holding past it's 10th birthday (well, maybe a bottle of the Poyferre in the interest of science). PLans can change as I retaste in future, of course.

take care, Dale

Reply to
Dale Williams
Loading thread data ...

snipped-for-privacy@aol.com (Dale Williams) wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@posting.google.com:

Is there a case for saying the 1999s are quite good value, simply because everyone was waiting for the 2000, or have things sorted themselves out now.

I remember people saying that the '99 vintage was quite similar to the '97, and we are seeing some really excellent prices for those wines now. It was just a thought that floated past when I was reading this.

Reply to
Steve Naïve

DrinksForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.