A cheap Zin

Our house wine is Cline's cali zin. About 8 US. , and also some other cheapies. So I picked up Napa Ridge Cali Zin at US 6.00. Dark cherry and some blueberry. Almost no oak. Lots of cocoa. No aging, just drink and enjoy. We do have a little cellar, but we drink too much.

Rich R.

-- The journey is the reward.

Reply to
Rich R
Loading thread data ...

I do not like the Cline Zin, although many people do. For a cheap zin I like Ravenswood Sonoma County (not Vintner's Blend).

Dimitri

Reply to
D. Gerasimatos

Napa Ridge. Nothing to do with Napa. Heh-heh.

Dana

Reply to
Dana Myers

But it's the Blend that competes with the cheapo Cline. For my money the Cline has been much better the past 3 years or so.

The Ravenswood Sonoma County is in a higher price bracket. In that price range I'm thinking the basic Renwood might also be a good choice, but my memory may be failing me here WRT the price point.

-- Robert

Reply to
Robert Stevahn

I've found the Cline CA zin to be surprisingly vintage-dependent (surprising just as in lower end general appelation wines tend to be less vintage variable than say single vineyard stuff). I really liked the '98, loved the '99 (the best under $10 zin I've had in last 5 years), found the '00 drinkable but not worth buying, with the 2001 back to liked.

A lot of (knowledgable) people disagreed with me re the 2000. It had a heavy feel (with an almost portish nose) that appealed a lot to some, but not to me.

Dale

Dale Williams Drop "damnspam" to reply

Reply to
Dale Williams

I've found that to be true of the Ravenswood Vintner's Blend, too, but I don't know how much of that is the wine and how much is my sense of what I like over time. Honestly, I used to buy lots of sub-US$10 Zins, now I rarely do.

-- Robert

Reply to
Robert Stevahn

Dale, I'm with you on this: some years I love the Cline CA Zin, others I find it boring. The same for the Ravenswood Vintners Blend, with the '01 the best I've yet tried. At this price point, people should also check out the Rosenblum Vintners Cuvee XXV, which is quite a nice wine for the price.

Mark Lipton

Reply to
Mark Lipton

The price difference is about $2-3.

Dimitri

Reply to
D. Gerasimatos

Hey Dimitri my Pac-10 brother,

The Sonoma Ravenswood is better but in a slightly higher price range than the Cline as was pointed out. But if you get it as Costco the Ravenswood is only about $12 instead of the $16 or so in the grocery. Well worth the ~$3 price jump if you're a Costco member.

GS

Reply to
Greg Sumner

Well I never said "exciting". But for QPR I would put up the Napa Ridge with the Vitners Blend. I am a cheap skate when it comes to everyday whites and reds.

Rich R.

Reply to
Rich R

Hi Dana,

Duh?

Rich R.

Reply to
Rich R

The label was sold to The Wine Group, the same folks that bottle Charles Shaw. There's no telling what's in the bottle. Napa Ridge is one of the irksome labels that the 'real' Napa wineries would like to restrict.

Doesn't mean the wine isn't good; some of it might be.

Dana

Reply to
Dana Myers

Dana Myers wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@arrl.net:

Sorry to de-lurk, but didn't you say earlier something like

and

to communicate with consumers in terms they know...

I expect those same consumers don't care about what is in the bottle of "Napa" Ridge... ;D

d
Reply to
abcdvitamin

Yup. Did I write something inconsistent?

Dana

Reply to
Dana Myers

DrinksForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.