A Rant

Although not a newbie to wine, I am a newbie to this group but couldn't resist so please bear with me.

Enjoyed a lovely homecooked meal of spicy Thai shrimp (don't mistake spicy for hot) on Sunday. Served a Hugel Gewerztraminer 2000, Tradition Hugel. Had everything you would expect from a well made Gewerz except it was 13% alcohol.

I am sufficiently familiar with the technical reasons for higher alcohol content (had hoped we could limit it to California Zin but alas...) but Alsace doesn't fit.

I live in hope that German rieslings and Alsatian Geverz will return to the lower alcohol levels that made their wines so enjoyable.

Ken Donovan

Reply to
donovan10
Loading thread data ...

"donovan10" wrote in news:lpihc.16360$ snipped-for-privacy@news04.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com:

Alsatian wines in general are finished alot drier (with resulting higher alcohol leverls) than their German counterparts. Go East a few miles for wines with more of the style that you seek.

Reply to
jcoulter

Ken Donovan wrote.....

I think that you are slightly off track, Ken.

Most of those gorgeous rieslings from the Mosel-Saar-Ruwer are still anything from 7-10% alcohol, as they always have been, and, in my experience, because Alsatian wines are generally fermented dry (or slightly off dry) most have an alcohol content in that 12-13% range - again, as they always have.

Vintage differences aside, I do not think that there has been any significant, recent change in these wines.

With the greatest of respect it is *Gewurztraminer*

st.helier

Reply to
st.helier
Reply to
James Silverton

] My stepmother, from rural Washington state in the US, pronouced it ] "Ga-WURTS-a-meener" but appreciated it very well anyway, whatever it was ] called and wherever it grew, and cooked insightful accompaniments. ] []

Max, a gentle and respectful reminder: top posting is discouraged. My thanks in advance and apologies if there is some technical reason, as with webtv users.

-E

Reply to
Emery Davis

I guess I must agree with your rebuttal as far as the usage of the Trimbach company is concerned but what can you expect of the French (g)? German language web pages always seem to use the umlaut but I'm not familiar enough with Alsace to say what people actually use there.

Best wishes,

Jim

Reply to
James Silverton

FWIW, I'm a bit challenged at the keyboard and I don't use grammatically correct accents (like umlaut's) when I'm responding on my news reader since for some reason my keyboard changes won't work unless I'm using a word processing software (like MS Word). I don't mean any disrespect or ignorance just a bit of laziness I guess.

Bi!!

Reply to
RV WRLee

grammatically

reader since for

I'd go along with that too since I don't usually bother with accents etc. in informal writing! Some of the replies with umlauts did not survive the net anyway(g). It seems that the French don't bother with them and my bit of pedantry was just a reponse to a correction :-) Just to add fuel to the fire, I suppose we might use the alternative German spelling, Gewuertztraminer, like the Swiss but I don't ever recall seeing that on a bottle.

Jim.

Reply to
James Silverton

"Mark Lipton" skrev i melding news:c65vl1$csu$ snipped-for-privacy@mozo.cc.purdue.edu...

Ouch? Here we would say Oeuf, oeuf... Much more fitting, I think :-) Anders

Reply to
Anders Tørneskog

Forgive my posting ignorance, but what does this mean?

-emily (winemonger)

Reply to
winemonger

snipped-for-privacy@earthlink.net (winemonger) wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@posting.google.com:

Proper netiquette requires that posters put their comments either at the end of the previous matterial, as I am doing, or interspersing it through the text at relevant points ( of course it also calls for judiciaous trimming of text to get rid of matter no longer in debate.(hence only the relevant data shown above.)

Reply to
jcoulter

st. helier

I just check my bottle of Trimbach (in the fridge), and you are right, no umlaut. But the Riverview (Ontario) Gewurz. I have been sipping tonite HAS the umlaut. Although, I don't include it, because I do not have the character set.

Tom Schellberg (no umlaut on this name)

Reply to
Xyzsch

This advice is constructively offered and taken, though I would submit that the situation has a basis, not just dogma; and admits some flexibility. (I did so submit, in email several hours ago to Emery Davis and such other frequent recent posters as I could readily find addresses for.)

This particular Netiquette preference is comparatively recent and a reaction, I believe, to newbie habits. Netiquette must adapt to changing times. The first public Netiquette guide I used was written late 1982 (I may have it on paper still; one of the people behind it is quoted below) and evolved by 1995 into RFC1855, the standard public document on the subject and the starting point for most later "Netiquette" guidance. My email today was an earnest feedback inviting further comment (please email me if you want a copy).

Following Netiquette of MUCH longer standing, I plan to keep that discussion offline and summarize later here if appropriate. Or to quote a 1982 posting:

(and references) and I'll summarize soon.

(Sorry, narrative flow required top-posting for that quotation. :-)

Best to all -- Max Hauser

Reply to
Max Hauser

DrinksForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.