Yes, again, after two unsuccessful trials in 2005 (caught a flu the day before leaving Vienna for Florence) and 2006 (my wife got a kidney stone on day two in Florence so we drove back immediately).
Did you read this thread? I bought a $10 bottle of "Chianti Riserva" (not "Chianti Classico Riserva") and was less than impressed with its contents. Any typical $10-12 Sicilian Nero d'Avola blows it away.
Oh, I see.. You are talking about the Chianti Riserva of the start of the thread, the Via Firenze. Apparently this Campagna Gello is a bottler, probably specialized on the US market. There seems to be an Apulian red bottled by them too: IGT Puglia Primitivo "Il Valore", see for instance:
formatting link
Then they sell this Chianti Arcano:
formatting link
There is also another Chianti Riserva by them, "Familia Cara":
formatting link
Also..
formatting link
Chances are that they do not see a single grape in their activity, and that they only buy wines by the bulk and bottle/label it for a market they choose. Personally, I would prefer to buy wine from those who make it, rather than from those who merely label it and sell it. But this may be a biased position of mine.
I think the marketing of a Chianti Riserva is a bit odd. Plain 'Chianti' is supposed to be a cheap wine, or at least that's what I thought. Why a $10 plain Chianti Riserva? It doesn't make any sense! Riservas are supposed to be special lots of wine from the best vineyards, right?
Actually, it should not be supposed to be a "cheap wine". It is supposed to be _on_ _average_ less pricy than a Chianti Classico. But not a cheap wine, in theory. It depends on the specific implementation of the Chianti-whatever wine: generally speaking a single estate wine should ensure a more accurate product, still on the average.
Yes, in general "riserva" is supposed to be a selection and not made every year, but only in the best vintages. This theoretically speaking. They should be fuller bodied, and aged for longer. Again: on average. A 10$ Chianti Riserva, i.e. a Chianti Riserva which reaches the US final customer at 10$ per bottle, with all you lot told me about the three-tier system of US wine distribution, would mean that this wine left the bottler at about 2 $ per bottle, which sounds pretty low price. Maybe in this case the 3-tier system was just not operating, dunno...
I don't know if it would have been even that much. In any event, I thought the wine was not good at all, because it had no flavor to speak of. It was neutral-tasting, like water, but it was deeply colored and not 'watery' in texture. I suggested the dealer not buy any more, but he said someone ordered a case of it!
But someone thought highly of it!! Is it possible I got a flajey bottle? the wine was not 'bad' (I have had 'bad' wine before), but it simply was not 'good'.
Relative notions of "good", "bad", and "ugly", I suppose. A wine which is:
a- neutral tasting b- like water c- deeply coloured d- "not 'watery' " in texture (i.e. tannins like a tarmac, I guess)
we may dispute about whether it is "not good" or "bad", as long and fiercely as we want, but: I think I will hardly find myself fighting in order to get the last glass of it.
I understand, but I believe that by now (at least since the advent of widespread oenological wisdom and common sense) we can rule out the cases of blatantly faulty wine, and speak of the above mentioned kind of wines in terms of "bad" wine. The faulty ones may well deserve the appellative of "ugly", I think.
I will try and get it, but seems unlikely I can find it: never heard of. I will let you know if I can make it. Or I could always go and pay visit to the bottling guys, near Pisa..;-)
DrinksForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.