Re: Frustrated by Burgundies, but fighting back

Loading thread data ...

"radishpicker" in news: snipped-for-privacy@posting.google.com...

Some good stuff if the vintage is good (I don't know). Note that Dujac _Fils et Pere_ is the son's recent operation and my sampling of those from last year or two showed very differently from the established (glorious) Dujac house so don't confuse them.

The regular Dujac village wines, though hardly cheap, can still be good values. Cultivate a merchant. These were wonderful wines in 2001, though up in price for various coincidental reasons.

No, you can get Bourgognes Rouges for $20 or village wines like Beaune or G-C for $30-40 that contain "the essence" of good Burgundy if you get good ones from good years. Lafarge B-R's have delivered very well in the last decade. I believe I listed some further past examplesnot long ago, search the archives re good-value Burgundies.

Very creditably product, I buy it too. Different style, distinct spicy (clove?) wood character.

Arggh! Save your soul, look beyond point ratings. "As good of a point rating as" hints at near-perdition already, you are taking the numbers much more seriously than does any Burgundy fan I know. None of them would compare point scales of US vs. French pinots -- that misses everything. The sorts of US journalists known for emphasizing (and introducing) point ratings are taken the least seriously among experienced Burgundy lovers I know (in various countries). (Some consumers in the US seem stubbornly, resolutely unaware of this reality.) Invest a little money in standard Burgundy books by Coates and Remington Norman (amazon.com lists them for example) or even Stevenson's "New Sotheby" general wine encyclopedia, US $30 or so, and come up to speed in background information and get to know your merchant and then leave the "points" for nouveau Bordeaux stockpilers and the unfortunates who actually say things to each other like "life is too short to drink wines rated under 90 points."

Reply to
Max Hauser

I'm assuming at $23 this is the Saintsbury Carneros (more expensive than the Garnet, less than the Reserve or Brown Ranch)? Usually one of my favorite CA pinots, though haven't bought last couple vintages. Different than a Burg, though not in the mode of a RRV PN. I like it, but it's on the level of a good Bourgogne, not the equivalent of a $50 1er cru. What vintages are those wines? For current releases (2000/2001) the Lafarge Bourgogne seems high/reasonable, but the other Lafarges (VS and 1er Cru) seem unreasonablely high. Anyway, I'd try the Lafarge and Bachelet generic Bourgognes (actually, the Bachelet CdNuitsVillages is usually a step up for maybe $2 more) to see if you like the style. You aren't going to get profound Burgundy at $20, but you can see if the style appeals to you.

For years Fèvre was the king of oaky Chablis, but new-oak use seems to have moderated. 2002 has a good rep, though I've only tasted a few (Brocard, Savary, Picq) but so far so good.

Good luck, report back! Dale

Dale Williams Drop "damnspam" to reply

Reply to
Dale Williams

Dale, the prices that I have found are for 2002 futures. I made this post because the prices seemed a bit high to me, even for Burgundies which have a reputation of being sort of expensive. Not that I have any experience here, but I question the value. I recently bought 2001 Cos de Estournel for $51 which I expect to be a blockbuster of a wine, and I just don't know if the Burgundies, which are even more expensive, will have any where near the value for the buck. I guess the 2002 vintage expectations are driving prices way up?

Andy

For current releases (2000/2001) the Lafarge

Reply to
radishpicker

I've had the Reserve, but not recently. I got a bottle of the Brown Ranch for a gift a year or so ago. Seemed like laying it down was the right thing to do, so I did.

It was the D'Angerville. Quite disappointing. There was no "there" there. :^(

I bought a third bottle, too. The vintage isn't printed on my receipt, but I think it was 2001 Girardin Santenay ($24US). At first it didn't impress me much. Seemed tannic and lacking fruit. After several hours it finally opened up and turned out to be pretty good. A bit weightier than the Chorey and more likely to be ageworthy.

Tom S

Reply to
Tom S

Someone from the heartland of Burgundy should surely be welcome here. :^)

It's a _lot_ better than my French!

I agree 100% with that, but I actually believe the vintners are worse than the growers.

I'm interested in _those_.

You're getting close to advertisement with that. This is a _non_commercial newsgroup. I want to hear about good wines, but actually promoting and/or advertising them is not permitted here. Your website URL is enough. Those who are interested will contact you there.

Thanks in advance.

Tom S

Reply to
Tom S

a gift a year or so ago. Seemed like laying it down was the right thing

Nice gift :)

Was this the multi-vineyard 1er, or a single 1er Cru? I can't believe it's the Clos des Ducs, which I found AMAZING in '99. I have 2 bottles of the generic '99 1er Cru fromCalvert Woodley sale, but put them away. My guess was like many '99s they might be closed now. I know the '95 shut down far about year or two after release (3-4 after vintage) and just reopened in last year or so. D'Angerville is a top producer, usually dependable.

I don't have much Santenay experience. But Girardin usually puts out a solid product.

thanks,

Dale

Dale Williams Drop "damnspam" to reply

Reply to
Dale Williams

I could be mistaken, but I _think_ it was a multi-vineyard wine. I didn't keep the label or any notes. I was doing well to still have the receipt!

Tom S

Reply to
Tom S

DrinksForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.