When friends ask for food pairings, I always recommend Riesling, the universal grape.
But I'm not sure - are there any specific dishes where this advice fails?
When friends ask for food pairings, I always recommend Riesling, the universal grape.
But I'm not sure - are there any specific dishes where this advice fails?
We all have different preferences, but to me riesling is not a universal grape; it doesn't go with everything. For example, I'd rather have no wine with steak, roast beef, lamb chops, or hamburgers than have Riesling with it.
Riesling is a very versatile white grape, but it's not an ideal choice with most red meats. I think that tomato-based dishes also can overwhelm it. With Riesling, it also depends on the sweetness level. "Dessert wine"-type Rieslings (Auslese and up) are really not suited for much food beyond certain cheeses and maybe nuts (ironically, they would be terrible with most desserts).
Just my $0.02, Mark Lipton
Yes, but as I understand it, the term "dessert wine" does not mean a wine to be served with dessert. It mean a wine to be *used* as a dessert.
Quite so, Ken, but that's not how a lot of people think of them, I find.
Mark Lipton
Yes, I've found the same thing.
A waiter in a restaurant in Bordeaux insisted that I have a glass of Sauternes with my foie gras. I know it's a classic pairing but it didn't enhance the dish on that occasion.
i'm with Mark and Ken, not a fan with red meat (well, maybe duck or goose if you consider red meat) or with tomato dishes (especially cooked, but fresh as well). Not a real clash but not my instinct with delicate white fish either. But lots of chicken, pork, rabbit, oily fish recipes it's my go-to (especially if Asian)
I don't waste even inexpensive wine on curries. I've found that cider (hard in the US) is the better accompaniment. Graham
DrinksForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.