Sancerre and terroir

For a little change of pace, I picked up a bottle of Pascal Jolivet 2003 Sancerre ($16US). If I had been served this wine blind I'd have _sworn_ that it was a Marlborough Sauvignon Blanc! It is almost colorless, with a slight greenish cast and has the typical "cat piss" aroma that is so distinctive of this varietal. There was nothing in the nose that betrayed its French origin, and only a slight softness on the palate that hinted at it. I recalled someone on this NG opining that Marlborough SBs seemed to show no trace of terroir - only fruit.

That got me to wondering: Could it be that terroir is a function of very slight, regional microbiological infections? ( I hesitate to use the term "spoilage".) IOW, if a wine is made very meticulously cleanly (as this wine obviously was) it will show _only_ fruit and give little or no hint of the origins of that fruit? Obviously this could only apply to white wines, as red grapes are fermented on their skins along with all the dirt etc. that comes in on them from the field. White juices OTOH are often very well cold settled and racked away from all that muck before it has much of a chance to affect the flavor.

Does good white winemaking technique consist in throwing away the terroir with the bathwater, so to speak?

Tom S

Reply to
Tom S
Loading thread data ...

"Tom S" wrote in news:kIyhc.53881$ snipped-for-privacy@newssvr25.news.prodigy.com:

There is very little in the way of white wine that can imitate a Chablis. I would like to ascribe most of the wet pebbles taste to terroir but I could be wrong it has happened.

Reply to
jcoulter

I've tasted - no, actually more _smelled_, what you are referring to, but have not found it to be universally present in Chablis, or completely absent in Chardonnay from other areas.

Are we confusing terroir with soil again? I'm still somewhat confused about the distinction. I'd always assumed that terroir was pretty much the same as terre - but my French is virtually nonexistent, and recently the distinction was pointed out to me here.

As a citizen of the USA, I'm quite ingrained with the concept of separation of powers, so viewing soil, climate and clone (as well as perhaps indigenous microbiological characteristics) all separately is quite comfortable to me - much moreso than mixing those properties all together and calling it "terroir". That may be a bit metaphorical, but I find it useful.

Tom S

Reply to
Tom S

This was the first example that came to my mind, too. I have had other non- (or lightly) oaked, non-ML chardonnays from NZ, Oregon and CA, but none have come close to capturing the essence of what makes Chablis so special and unique.

Mark Lipton

Reply to
Mark Lipton

I'd venture that it has more to do in this particular case with the fact that Jolivet is a very 'modern' or 'New World style' producer. His Sancerre's stylistically and winemaking methodology are closer to NZ than most of his peers.

The other difficulty is that Sauvignon Blanc (like Cabernet Sauvignon) is extremely good at retaining its varietal characteristics no matter what you to do it. If you eat a SB grape, you will instantly know it's Sauvignon Blanc. This is in total contrast to PN or Chardonnay which are more of a blank slate, a 'winemaker's' grape if you will. The main difference, like with Cab, is in the profile of a somewhat underripe Sauvignon Blanc (Loire, usually the grassy, goosberry, etc. profile) and the usually riper NZ version (bigger fruit, grapefruit, citrus, etc.)

Peter

Reply to
Peter Muto

Unfortunately Peter, several California wineries have been able to remove all traces of varietal characteristics with their 100% malolactic fermentation and new oak. It has less flavor than their Chardonnays. Chalk Hill is the main contender in this group.

Reply to
Bill

Tom S. wrote: "the typical "cat piss" aroma"

No no no! Not "cat piss!" Blackcurrant bud!

silly you.

Ok, I'm kidding. We all know what it smells like. But I have been schooled more than once that this distinct aroma is "blackcurrant bud."

emily (winemonger)

Reply to
winemonger

I can assure you that cat piss is a lot easier reference to find than blackcurrant buds - and I don't even _have_ a cat! I don't think I've ever seen blackcurrants, much less their buds.

Tom S

Reply to
Tom S

That's because Sauvignon Blanc at full ripeness simply doesn't have the intensity of ripe Chardonnay. That's why it was dubbed many years ago as "the poor man's Chardonnay".

Also, fully ripe SB tastes and smells very little of what you perceive as "varietal" (you know - that grassy, cat piss aroma).

Tom S

Reply to
Tom S

I agree with that assessment of Chardonnay, which is one of the things that I find makes it the most fun of any varietal to vinify. I disagree with that with respect to Pinot Noir (and other reds) however. Red wines are mostly made in the vineyard.

Tom S

Reply to
Tom S

I'm surprised you would say tht about Pinot Noir. Just my opinion, but all versions to me seem to retain a bacis cherry and spicy flavor. Although they seem to vary more in body more than any other varietal (eg Rully vs. Gevrey Chambertin).

Tom Schellberg

Reply to
Xyzsch

Salut/Hi Tom S,

le/on Wed, 21 Apr 2004 18:04:00 GMT, tu disais/you said:-

[snip]

[snip]

What a fascinating question. Thanks for asking.

I'm saying nothing, (My brother, who lurks here from time to time, would no doubt roar with laughter and tell you that's a first!). and reading everyone's comments.

Reply to
Ian Hoare

I suppose that's more accurate. I suppose the winemaking procedure is fairly similar for PN, the issue being the finicky grapes in the vineyard. What I was trying to get at was Pinot Noir's ability to express terroir, much more than say Cabernet or Sauvignon Blanc.

Reply to
Peter Muto

Hi, Ian - Your silence speaks volumes!

Tom S

Reply to
Tom S

Paso Robles Cabernet certainly smells and tastes different (to me, anyway) from Napa Cabernet.

I'll concede that Pinot Noir does seem to reflect regional differences a bit more obviously, however.

Tom S

Reply to
Tom S

DrinksForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.