Sangiovese

You're ever so right, a few Italian producers actually tried pawning of Zinfandel [1] ... food fro thought. I wonder if those plants were _real_ Zins, i e, imported from the US, or just the old Primitivo? Too bad the actual 'mother plant' is virtually unpronouncable ...

Cheers

Nils Gustaf

[1] No New World producer would ever try something as dastardly as trying to pawn of f their produce as, e g, Chablis, Port, or whatever ... [2] [2] This is what I perceive as a joke. However I am Swedish, and as such, well known to have no sense of humour whatsoever.
Reply to
Nils Gustaf Lindgren
Loading thread data ...

ROFLMAO. Of all the people on this Ng to use that retort.

hooroo...

Reply to
Matt S

Sure there are producers in the USA that borrow names. However, they make no attempt to claim the name as their own. The wine is named after the grape used. However, it is my understanding that in Italy some wineries are wanting to use Primitovo grapes but produce a wine called Zinfandel.

Reply to
miles

Miles, Carole Meredith's research showed that Zin and Primitivo are indeed very, very closely related, enough so that they could be called two clones of the same grape. However, it is also now recognized that Zin is indistinguiable from an obscure Croatian grape known as Crljenak kastelanski:

formatting link

Mark Lipton

Reply to
Mark Lipton

miles wrote in news:62OEg.1388$rT5.334@fed1read01:

Yup they borrow names, but not the grapes. Chablis in CA was made from IIRC Columbard grapes sweet and sticky and not the least bit of Chardonnay. Hearty Burgundy from Gallo similarly never saw a pinot noir grape.

Reply to
Joseph Coulter

The studies I read did show them very closely related but the Zin grape did not come from Primitivo. So they both came from some other grape such as Crljenak?

Reply to
miles

As I said, anything goes with the lower end wines in the USA. Chablis is generally one of them. Jug wines have any and all names.

Reply to
miles

miles wrote in news:gkPEg.1395$rT5.1193@fed1read01:

Uhh, you said and I quote "Sure there are producers in the USA that borrow names. However, they make no attempt to claim the name as their own. The wine is named after the grape used."

CA Chablis was named after a French region and had none of the varietal in it.

Reply to
Joseph Coulter

As you point out, Chablis is a region, not a grape varietal so not sure what your point is.

Reply to
miles

miles wrote in news:TlQEg.1400$rT5.841@fed1read01:

if you had not snipped your material you would see that you had claimed that Sure there are producers in the USA that borrow names. However, they make no attempt to claim the name as their own. The wine is named after the grape used."

but that is not true the producers named the wines after the region not the grape. I will not discuss this further as you are obviously not trying to be consistent in your argument.

Reply to
Joseph Coulter

It's certainly possible. The history of Primitivo in Puglia only goes back 150 years (demurral: it may have been there much longer but not been officially recognized), which then forces the question of where it came from, along with where Zin came from (it's known that Zin arrived in the US from the Imperial botanical collection of the Austro-Hungarian empire, but the name is a bit of disinformation since it's a corruption of Zierfandler, a white grape). So, Croatia is a perfectly logical source, since it resides across the Adriatic from Italy and was in the Hapsburg empire in the 19th Century. There is also speculation that it may have reached there from Albania or Greece, so who knows?

Mark Lipton

Reply to
Mark Lipton

As did "Champagne," "Burgundy," "Rhinewine," "Port" and assorted other "borrowed" names.

Mark Lipton

Reply to
Mark Lipton

DrinksForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.