South American Wines

Notes from a most interesting tasting last evening. The theme was South American wine, and there was some chatter from some of the quidnuncs that hang around hereabout to the effect that there weren't enough decent South American wines to be going on about. Idle and ill-informed chatter, as anyone that has bothered to investigate the region (and anyone that attended the tasting) can attest to the quality of wines coming from the area.

The tasting was blind and was accompanied by many (I forget just how many) delightful small courses of various food.

2001 Casa Lapostolle Cuvee Alexandre Chardonnay - this could have been any Californian Chardonnay - barrel fermented, left on the lees, it has the mark of not always deft influence of oak, but lacks the manic Antipodean levels of quercosity exhibited by some examples from Oz. Under the direction of Michel Rolland as consulting winemaker to this winery, as well as many others, the barrels are Burgundian but the wine is not. Well made and a better value locally at least, than most of the American examples.

2000 Torres Cordillera - another European family involved in the Chilean industry, this time Spanish. This wine is a blend of carignane (65%), syrah (15%) and merlot (20%). It is fairly dark (a characteristic of most wines at this event), and bears a big sweet toasty nose with black pepper (courtesy of the syrah, perhaps?). It is smooth in the mouth with soft tannins, and should continue to develop for a couple more years and hold for several more. It entered the local market above $30 a bottle, but has just been dropped to under $25 Can., a relative bargain. I was going to bring an older wine (93 Don Maximiano from Errazuriz) but thought people might like to taste something they could still buy.

1998 Antiyal - less than 400 cases a year of this cabernet, syrah, carmenere blend is made (253 in this vintage). Big sweet nose with some lead pencil, and a smooth presence on palate - it was a good wine that still has time, but drinks very well now.

2003 Kingston Family Vineyards Alazan - big jammy nose with a bit of anise, a sweet forward fruit bomb that is ready to roll - the only hint that this was a pinot noir was in the nose. Only 230 cases produced, and if you want to stump someone this is a great candidate. One taster seemed personally offended that they would dare make a pinot noir in this style, but I thought it was very tasty, and probably a bit more pinot-like than some of the oddball examples that find their way into bottles in Australia, which often bear even less resemblance to pinot than this did.

1997 Concha Y Toro Don Melchor Cabernet Sauvignon - fairly dark and the excellent nose featured mint and an animal element. Lots of tannins here, but the fruit seems to be sufficient. A big wine that needs another 2 - 3 years to settle down.

2001 Clos Apalta - this high end blend from Lapostolle is 80% merlot and carmenere in unspecified proportions, and the balance cabernet. Big rich nose but also hot with alcohol, rich and fairly ripe in the mouth with soft tannins and excellent length. Very nice.

1996 Errazuriz Don Maximiano - I didn't have to bring the 93 after all as someone else presented this vintage. a Bordeaux nose on this one, slightly stewy with a tomato element. Soft entry but then it tightened up, and had a bit of a hollow spot in the middle, finishing sweetly.

1997 Carmen Winemaker's Reserve - this cab had a big sweet minty nose with a slightly stemmy capsicum note, lots of tannin but fairly soft, and it was balanced and drinking well now. Interesting blend - 20% carmenere (which they call Grand Vedure) 20% petite sirah, 10% merlot.

2000 Achaval Ferrer Malbec, Cabernet Sauvignon Merlot (37%, 32%, 31%) - the Argentinian wine industry has been making great progress in recent years (personally, I'd put it down to the vitality that came from the influx of all the war brides returning with the soldiers from the Falklands - I hear they were hard to bleat….I know, a baaaaad joke). The nose was predominantly cabernet in style, and there was a fair bit of oak. The flavours were well integrated and the wine is ready to drink. An interesting wine and our only Argentine entry (I thought of bringing the excellent 1997 Finca Flichman Dedicado).
Reply to
Bill Spohn
Loading thread data ...

think I got title right (newsreader filters messsages over certain lenght, I can read them, but they're not stored, so if I don't reply first time....)

I could certainly be described as a quidnunc, and certainly one who has disparaged some S.American wines. All? No. I've had some quite good ones. But my objections tend to fall into 2 categories:

1)the sweet oakchip swill that predominates on the lower end (there are some good ones, but they are heavily outnumbered) 2) The top end ones. Good wines? Sure. But every time I see something like Errazuriz Don Maximiano or Sena, some marketeer is trumpeting that they are "the quality equivalent of a first-growth Bordeaux." Not to my tastes. And frankly I'm not rushing to pay $60-75 US for these, when I can get things with a long track record for less ('96 Poyferre or Barton for under $50, for example).

Nice notes, in any case. :)

Dale

Dale Williams Drop "damnspam" to reply

Reply to
Dale Williams

What? No Montes Alpha, Bill? What kind of operation are you running there? ;-)

Mark Lipton

Reply to
Mark Lipton

IMHO the strength of Chile is not in the premium blends that are, as you say, touted beyond reason by the producers, but by the middle range of wines - the ones above the basic under $10 plonk.

Wines like the Cordillera (c. $20), or the excellent Montes Alpha range (c. $19), the Los Vascos Reserve (c.$16), the Cousino Macul reserve cab and merlot and Finis Terrae (c.$15), the Lapostolle Cuvee Alexandre range (c. $19-20) - these are the affordable middle ground that will make the reputation of the region.

Maybe not in the US, but up here in Canada, they absolutely kill any of the American competition at the price!

Reply to
Bill Spohn

I cellar the Syrah and the reserve Cab, and have a few bottles of the outrageously expensive 'M' and Folly as well, but one can't taste everthing at one tasting, and I felt that the Cordillera was a more interesting wine for the others to taste given the price reduction here.

I agree that the Montes line is excellent, even down to the lower regions - the Cabernet Sauvignon/Carmenere is very decent.

Reply to
Bill Spohn

I'd agree this is where the strength lies- and will keep an eye out for the Finis Terrae and Cordillera! Dale

Dale Williams Drop "damnspam" to reply

Reply to
Dale Williams

Here in the UK, most wine kills US competition _at the price_, which is sad, because I quite like American wine!

Still, they never said this would be an inexpensive hobby... ;)

Reply to
Dan Gravell

I love the Chilian Carmenere - I just love the grape. Nothing quite like it - it's sufficiently different from Merlot and Syrah to be something quite distinct and best drunk on its own rather than mixed.

=== Andy Evans ==Visit our Website:-

formatting link
Audio, music and health pages and interesting links.

Reply to
Andy Evans

DrinksForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.