Tale of two Ridges

Aug 21, 2006 1 Replies

A couple nights ago, it was the 25th anniversary of wedded bliss with SWMBO. We made reservations at a local establishment renowned both for it's food, and wine cellar. We chose a '98 Ridge Monte Bello (Bordeaux style blend) - our first experience with this renowned wine. I won;t mention the price - suffice to say that we won;t be eating out for a while. We had the bottle opened for about 40 minutes before pouring. The nose was initially amazing; all kinds of spicey fruit - almost like an aged Zin - with a balanced oak. But as time wore by we noticed less fruit character on the nose and more oak. Still excellent - but by the last glass, it was almost like drinking a completely different wine. We personally preferred the fruit character, so we felt the intial nose was better than the latter. On the palate the wine was soft and subtle - almost a bit much so, but with a long satisfying finish. The acididty was well balanced - and the color perfect; deep and dark, but brilliantly clear. Each year certainly brings a different character to a wine, but we thought the '98, while being an excellent wine, was not worth the price tag.



Two nights later, last night, we decided to pull a Ridge out of the cellar - a 2002 Geyserville (Zin, Carignan, Petit Sirah). On our family 'modified 100 point scale' the wine scored a 91.5 - giving it an 'excellent'. We really enjoyed this wine; a remarkable nose, with spice, leather, dark fruits, and balanced oak; excellent color; rich flavor, with a long satisfying finish. With a price tag in the high $20's, we still recommend this wine to any and all. This is a Zin dominated blend that can stand respectfully with Bordeaux style blends.


en vino veritas


I'm sorry but I'm going to have no choice but to sue you for trademark infringment. Your use of "modified" in a wine point scale infringes on my "Modified Parker scale", and your using only one decimal point devalues my four decimal point precison, reducing the percieved value of my esteemed rating system. Further, you "clarify" the numerical ranking with a single English word.

Pretty soon people will come to believe that wine cannot be ranked to four decimal place precision, and we'll be reduced to grunts and "number of bottles drunk" as an evaluation. Civilization will fall, my business model will be ruined, and it will be your fault entirely.

OTOH, maybe I'll just have a drink. :)

Jose

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required